ALBA will re-run its internal elections amid accusations of “abuse” said to have been directed at Alex Salmond's family from some party members.
Salmond was said to have produced a “black dossier” at Alba’s conference last month, which a party source told The National contained evidence of “vicious attacks” on the party leader's family and “almost every notable member” before announcing the votes would be redone.
The party has now confirmed elections to Alba’s national council will be held next month after “technical issues” were reported in the ballot before the October conference.
An Alba source said: “At the start of the conference, before the recording began, Alex Salmond was set to announce the results of the national office bearer elections in a private session.
READ MORE: Was Stephen Flynn really holding his poppy wreath the wrong way?
“As he stepped up to speak, he addressed a few complaints he had received regarding the election process, ranging from issues with the voting system to allegations of fraud.
“These were generally small issues like people complaining about not being able to change their vote after already voting to people complaining about voting issues that they themselves hadn't personally experienced.
“These complaints were resolved satisfactorily, leaving no doubt about the legitimacy of the election in relation to these concerns.
“However, Salmond then held up a black dossier that had been leaked to him, containing printouts from various chatrooms where certain members of the NEC [National Executive Committee] facing election, as well as potential NEC candidates, were engaged in vicious attacks on a variety of issues.
“According to Salmond, there were reprehensible personal attacks on almost every notable member of the party, including his family, and evidence of members conspiring as well as suggesting disruptions during the conference.
READ MORE: How can David Cameron be appointed Foreign Secretary when he's not an MP?
“Salmond's tone was resolute as he emphasized that the messages in the dossier were very serious and they posed a threat to the integrity of the internal party election.
“He announced that the election would be rerun in December, with the electoral process paused from the moment of his speech to ensure a fair and just election.
“While Salmond's decisions seem entirely fair, this exposed the presence of a group of people within the party opposed to prominent party members and desperate to exert their own control.
“There was no clear indication of who was involved in these chats or whether any further action would be taken against.”
Alba would not confirm whether it was taking action against those accused of launching attacks on Salmond and other high-profile party members when approached by The National and it is not known who was said to have been involved.
Neale Hanvey (above), the Alba MP for Kirkcaldy, has addressed the controversy publicly, responding to a tweet which accused party member Craig Berry of “propping up the SNP”.
The MP wrote: “There can be no place for whispering campaigns, dishonest rumours or deliberate smears. We don’t need any more false starts or empty promises.
“We don’t need empire builders who put ego before the needs of the Scottish people or the aims of this party. Anyone who seeks to import such scurrilous behaviours into this party or the wider movement must be called out.”
An Alba spokesperson said: “A minor number of technical issues occurred in the online ballot.
“They resulted in a variety of difficulties for some 20 members in an electorate of thousands. However elections both have to be fair and seen to be fair.
“Thus they will be re-run with the same electorate finalising at national council in December when the new team of office-bearers will be fully in place.
“All party members have already been notified, last week, about the timetable for the rearranged internal elections.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel