RICHARD Leonard has called on Labour MPs to back the SNP amendment to the King's speech calling for a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war.
The former Scottish Labour leader, writing in the Tribune Magazine, said that voting for the motion wasn’t about siding with the SNP, but “[siding] with humanity”.
An SNP amendment calling for “all parties to agree to an immediate ceasefire” will likely be voted on at the end of the King’s Speech debate on Wednesday.
Leonard – a current Labour MSP for central Scotland – said that Labour's MPs “must put themselves on the right side of history” and vote on the issue in the Commons.
Scottish Labour has two MPs - shadow Scottish Secretary Ian Murray and the newly elected Michael Shanks.
It comes as UK Labour leader Keir Starmer has come under growing pressure from within his own party to back a ceasefire rather than a “humanitarian pause” – which Leonard calls a “contradiction in terms”.
He said: “It is not humanitarian to briefly ‘pause’ this slaughter to allow a besieged people some limited access to food and water or to drive them from their homes, never to return, so they can be bombed somewhere else at a later date.”
Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie accused the SNP of “game playing” over Gaza on Tuesday, saying the position of Scottish leader Anas Sarwar was “clear” in calling for a ceasefire – but repeatedly refused to say how she expected her party’s two Scottish MPs to vote.
Leonard called into question whether backing the SNP amendment would "revive the party” amid ongoing struggles. To the contrary, he said not doing so “risks hindering the Scottish Labour Party’s hopes of advance”.
Leonard then said that being an MP is “to hold in your hands a great privilege”.
He went on: “It offers a chance to make a difference, to do the right thing. It is my deepest conviction that all that people want, including the people of Israel and Palestine, is a chance to live in peace.
“There is no inevitability about what is happening. The future is unwritten. Labour MPs should follow their conscience, their own moral compass, and the views of the people who send them to Parliament, from whom their power is borrowed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel