ANAS Sarwar has been urged to confirm whether he thinks the Scottish Parliament’s only purpose is to mitigate Tory policies after one of his frontbench MSPs made the claim.
In what the SNP have branded a “bizarre intervention”, Paul O’Kane asked the Presiding Officer on Tuesday: “What is the point in this Parliament, Presiding Officer, if not to mitigate the policies of this Conservative government?"
The SNP have now called on Labour leader Sarwar to clarify his position on the “astonishing” comment.
SNP MSP Ivan McKee said the remarks show a lack of respect for devolution.
READ MORE: Calls for peace in Gaza branded 'naïve' by Rishi Sunak
He said: “Anas Sarwar must urgently clarify whether his MSP’s tacit acceptance of brutal Tory austerity status quo is his party’s official position.
"Labour have drifted so far from their founding values under Starmer, that their frontbench in Holyrood have now become apologists for Tory austerity.
“Mr O’Kane’s remarks yesterday show a distinct lack of respect for devolution and proves Labour has no ambition for Scotland. These comments will be deeply concerning for anyone who respects Scotland’s national parliament.
"The Scottish Parliament should not be merely a stopgap for Westminster governments.
“The SNP is the only party that will always put Scotland first."
READ MORE: BBC Radio 4: SNP withdrew ceasefire motion, claims Lisa Nandy
O’Kane - Labour’s shadow cabinet secretary for social justice, social security and equalities – spoke in a debate on the latest Building a New Scotland paper, entitled Migration to Scotland after independence.
He was asked by Independence Minister Jamie Hepburn if mitigation was the highest hope he had for Holyrood.
He said in response: “In the current situation where we have a Conservative government that doesn’t seem to care, that’s bringing in legislation that’s pernicious, this Government doesn’t seem to want to mitigate it. Why is that?
“What is this point in this Parliament, Presiding Officer, if not to mitigate the policies of this Conservative Government?”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel