KEIR Starmer has insisted Labour is united on the Israel-Hamas war – despite a massive rebellion from his MPs on the issue and a wave of resignations from his team.
The Labour leader claimed there was “absolute unity” on the issue after 56 MPs defied him to vote with the SNP for a ceasefire, with 10 members of his frontbench resigning as a result.
It is thought to be the biggest challenge to his leadership since replacing Jeremy Corbyn in 2020.
Speaking during a visit to Scotland on Thursday, Starmer told ITV News: “I think there is absolute unity about what we’re trying to achieve.
“This is not like some of the disagreements you see in politics. This is about many, many people, not actually just in politics, many people watching this who are watching their screens saying ‘what could we do to alleviate what is an awful situation?’
“Those hostages are still being held. There’s a terrible humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
“We have to make, working with our allies to make a material difference to that. So in terms of what people are trying to achieve, there is unity about what we’re trying to achieve.”
READ MORE: Ex-Labour MP blasts 'grovelling' Anas Sarwar after MPs vote against ceasefire
The most high profile MP to quit from the frontbench to vote for a ceasefire was Jess Phillips.
Asked whether he regretted her departure, Starmer said: “Of course, I want us to move forward as united as we can as a party, but you wouldn’t expect me to stand here today and say my concern is the Labour Party management rather than the hostages and the innocent civilians and children that are dying in Gaza.
“My focus and attention is there, and that’s where it is where it will always be.”
It comes after his shadow overseas development minister Lisa Nandy questioned the extent to which international law applied in Gaza when asked about the ferocity of Israel’s response to Hamas’s attacks on October 7.
Speaking at an event in Westminster on Thursday, Nandy said: “We’ve been really clear, as a front bench, that regardless of questions of international law – and international law is, it was built for a different era between two state parties, there are questions about you know, how far and when it applies in situations like these.
“But civilians have to be protected, that is absolutely clear.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel