SCOTTISH Tory leader Douglas Ross has urged the First Minister to timetable a debate at Holyrood next week so MSPs can further question Michael Matheson about data roaming charges he racked up on holiday in Morocco.
After Matheson made an emotional statement in Parliament detailing how his teenage sons had used his Holyrood-issued iPad to watch football matches, Ross insisted in a fresh letter to Humza Yousaf that his words had raised “more questions than answers”.
Matheson – whose iPad use abroad led to a bill of almost £11,000 – has been accused of lying to the public and press after he initially insisted the device had only been used for parliamentary work during the trip.
The Health Secretary said he had not been aware his family had used the iPad until last Thursday after the first media reports emerged. He insisted it was used by his sons as a hotspot to allow internet access from other devices.
READ MORE: New Scottish independence paper outlines benefits of rejoining EU
In his letter, Ross has asked Yousaf a host of questions about what he knew and when, such as why he said on Wednesday – the day before Matheson revealed the full details of the data usage – that Matheson had made “an honest mistake in relation to the sim card not being updated” when by this point he allegedly knew Matheson’s family members had used the device.
Ross asked Yousaf if he would demand Matheson publish “all the work conducted during his holiday in Morocco or at the very least disclose the volume of work”.
Humza Yousaf owes the public an explanation and apology for backing a minister he knew had lied.
— Douglas Ross MP MSP (@Douglas4Moray) November 17, 2023
I've written to the First Minister demanding answers to some serious questions that remain. His integrity is on the line every bit as much as that of his disgraced Health Secretary👇 pic.twitter.com/h78V06yhGn
The Tory leader additionally said a parliamentary spokesperson had “directly contradicted” Matheson by suggesting there was no record of him being told he could use the iPad as a hotspot.
He asked Yousaf if he would be investigating whether GDPR had been breached.
READ MORE: Lisa Nandy questions 'how far' international law applies in Gaza
Ross went on: “Given the lack of transparency and the growing list of questions, it is right Parliament has more time to scrutinise the timeline of Michael Matheson’s and your own statements.
“Will you therefore agree to timetable a debate next week whether further questions can be put to the Health Secretary directly?
“Contrary to your previous claims to the press, a line has not been drawn under this matter and many questions remain unanswered by you and Michael Matheson. The public deserve transparency.”
Speaking to the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland programme on Friday, Scottish Conservatives’ depute leader Meghan Gallacher said Matheson’s story had “changed significantly” and his position was “untenable”.
On Thursday, Matheson apologised for the situation and said he had not mentioned his family’s involvement earlier because he was a “father first and foremost” and had wanted to “protect” his children from “the political and media scrutiny”.
At First Minister’s Questions directly before the statement was made, Yousaf said he had “absolute confidence” in Matheson.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel