HUMZA Yousaf has called on Scottish Labour to “stand firm and back an immediate ceasefire” whilst tabling a parliamentary motion on Gaza to be debated in Holyrood tomorrow (Tuesday, 20 November).
The motion will be the first time the Scottish Parliament has the opportunity to vote for a ceasefire, and follows votes in the Welsh Assembly and the UK Parliament last week, with Scottish Labour and Tory MPs failing to support the latter.
This will be the fourth motion lodged in the Scottish Parliament calling for a ceasefire after Alba MSP Ash Regan, Scottish Greens MSP Ross Greer and SNP MSP Kaukab Stewart put forward motions earlier in the month.
READ MORE: Scottish Government to hold debate calling for ceasefire in Gaza
The First Minister's motion text states: "That this Parliament unequivocally condemns in the strongest possible terms Hamas’s barbaric and unjustifiable terrorist attacks against Israeli citizens on 7 October, and demands the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages; agrees all human life is equal and abhors the loss of innocent lives and affirms the right of all Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security; agrees the killing of innocent civilians in Gaza, including women and children who have been besieged by Israeli forces, must stop; associates itself with the UN Secretary General’s statements that there must be an immediate humanitarian ceasefire to allow civilians to escape harm, for hostages to be released, and for humanitarian aid to reach those in need and affirming that international humanitarian law, including the Geneva Conventions, must be upheld; reiterates its solidarity with Scotland’s Jewish, Muslim and Palestinian communities and condemns antisemitism, Islamophobia or any other form of hatred; welcomes the Scottish Government’s contribution of £750,000 towards the United Nations Relief and Works Agency’s flash appeal for Gaza, and the humanitarian assistance announced by the UK Government; and reaffirms that a credible, lasting and sustainable peace can only be based on the two-state solution through reinvigorated diplomatic and political efforts in the Middle East Peace Process; and agrees with many in the international community that all parties must agree to an immediate ceasefire."
Yousaf called on Anas Sarwar to "stand firm" and "not water down calls for a ceasefire, as it is being reported".
The First Minister's comments come after Scotland on Sunday reported that the Labour leader is set to propose an amendment at Holyrood that would water down the substance of the call for an immediate ceasefire.
However, on BBC on Sunday, Sarwar insisted his party would be “supporting the position that I've set out now for over three weeks.”
Sarwar refused to answer whether he would have voted for the Westminster SNP group amendment calling for a ceasefire in the Commons last week.
READ MORE: British Airways 'profiting from misery' with flight charges for Gaza escapees
Yousaf said: “The Scottish Parliament has an opportunity to unite to send a message of peace to world leaders and to those enduring untold suffering in the Middle East.
“The motion that will be debated, tabled today, condemns the barbaric and unjustifiable actions of Hamas, and echoes the calls of the UN Secretary-General for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire.
“This is a time for all of us to show leadership in the face of this humanitarian catastrophe. Anas Sarwar must stand firm and back an immediate ceasefire. The motion reflects his own public position on the issue. We will await the detail of the Labour amendment, but it must not water down calls for a ceasefire, as is being reported.
“An immediate ceasefire is the only way to end the tragic deaths of civilians. This week, I urge MSPs of all parties to come together and say enough is enough - the time for a ceasefire is now.”
A leaked policy note is the source of confusion and conflicting reports, as The Scotsman reported on Sunday that Labour is seeking to U-turn on their stance by lodging an amendment to the Scottish Greens motion, therefore avoiding any clear confrontation with UK leader Keir Starmer.
The note reportedly demands an end to rocket fire, the release of hostages, humanitarian aid supplies allowance, and a two-state solution peace process.
If this was the case, Sarwar, who has previously said there should be a ceasefire in the region “right now”, could face a similar rebellion within Holyrood as Starmer saw in Westminster.
Starmer saw 10 MPs quit his frontbench over the party’s refusal to back a ceasefire, with 56 MPs rebelling to back the SNP motion, which failed to pass.
Greer also called on Sarwar to “resist pressure”.
He said: “Earlier this week many of us commended the conviction of the rebel Labour MPs who stood against Keir Starmer and voted for a ceasefire.
“Anas Sarwar must now find that same conviction and resist pressure from party bosses in London to betray or water down a position we all know he holds. He knows the killing must stop.
“The people of Gaza don’t have time for Labour’s cynical games. They’re dying now. They’re running out of food and water now. They urgently need a lasting ceasefire and humanitarian aid corridors now. International pressure is critical to forcing that end to this slaughter.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel