THE UK’s arms exports to Israel are “relatively small” the Defence Secretary has insisted.
He was responding to a Labour MP who referenced the death of Palestinian civilians in the war between Israel and Hamas and asked “why arms sales to Israel have not yet been suspended”.
Grant Shapps said the UK is calling on all parties, including the Israelis, to act within international law.
Labour's Kim Johnson, the MP for Liverpool Riverside, said that since October 7 “12,000 innocent Palestinian civilians have been killed and two-thirds are women and children”.
She asked: “Can the minister confirm whether arms sold by the UK have been used in violations of international humanitarian law? And can he explain why arms sales to Israel have not yet been suspended?”
Shapps said the current situation started following attacks by Hamas, adding: “We do call on all parties, the Israelis included, to make sure they act within international humanitarian law.”
'Just £42 million last year'
He added: “Actually, our defence exports to Israel are relatively small, just £42 million last year and … they go through a very strict criteria before anything is exported.”
He also told the House all export applications are assessed on a “case-by-case basis” and the Government will not issue any export licences to any destination where it is not consistent with its criteria.
SNP MP Dave Doogan said ministers “rightly called out the wanton and unlawful destruction of civilian infrastructure in Ukraine” and asked: “Why can they not show the same equity of uproar at what’s happening to civilians in Gaza?”
Shapps said: “There’s a principle in international law that a country is able to defend itself.”
READ MORE: Scottish Labour will seek to 'strengthen' Government's ceasefire motion
He reiterated that the Government calls on Israel to ensure it protects civilians “in whatever way they can”, but added: “Hamas are using those civilians as human shields and deliberately using the infrastructure on top to hide behind it.
“I would have thought [Doogan] could see the difference.”
Tory MP Tobias Ellwood, who was forced off the Defence Committee after praising the Taliban, warned about “growing authoritarianism” in the world, saying: “Behind Hamas sits Iran, behind Iran sits Russia, and behind Russia increasingly sits China.”
He called on the UK to spend 3% of GDP on defence.
Shapps said: “We have indeed pledged to increase defence spending to 2.5% as economic conditions allow. This year it will probably be around 2.4%, so we’re making very good progress.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer drafts in Tony Blair to help build relations with Israel
“I talked about my own desire – prior to getting this particular role – to see higher defence spending, because we are living in a much less certain world with many, many more variables.”
Asked by shadow defence secretary John Healey what action is being taken to protect UK personnel in the Middle East “with attacks on US personnel rising”, Shapps said: “In terms of protecting our own personnel, I have asked the chief of the defence staff to review the position of those personnel.
“I made reference to the additional personnel who have moved to the region, but didn’t mention that several have been moved to Tel Aviv, Beirut and Jordan, all with the aim of protecting both British military personnel but also British citizens in the region.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel