AN Abu Dhabi-backed investment fund appears set to take control of The Telegraph and Spectator after striking a deal with their previous owners.
Lenders for the Barclay family, who relinquished control of the titles earlier this year, would need agree to the deal, which is also expected to receive severe political scrutiny.
It comes five months after restructuring specialists AlixPartners were appointed as receivers for the business to recover outstanding debts to lenders.
The Barclay brothers’ bank, Lloyds, hired the receivers to control and help launch a sales process of the business in order to repay debts from failed loans, worth more than £1 billion.
However, on Monday an investment fund, which is a joint venture between US firm RedBird Capital and International Media Investments of Abu Dhabi, confirmed it had struck the deal with the Barclays which it said would take the titles out of receivership and ensure debts to Lloyds were repaid.
RedBird IMI said it would provide a loan of up to £600 million, secured against the publications, with IMI also providing a similar loan against other Barclay-linked assets.
The fund said the deal includes an option to turn the loans into equity which would hand it control of the newspaper and magazine.
A spokesman said it plans to “exercise this option at an early opportunity”.
US-based RedBird said it would take over “management and operational responsibility” in the deal.
READ MORE: David Cameron has 'serious questions to answer' after joining Lords
Hedge fund millionaire and GB News investor Paul Marshall, Daily Mail publisher DMGT, Yorkshire Post owner National World and German publisher Axel Springer have all been linked with a takeover move for the Telegraph.
Meanwhile, DMGT and Rupert Murdoch’s News UK were both reportedly interested in a move for The Spectator.
The spokesman for RedBird IMI said: “Any transfer of ownership will of course be subject to regulatory review and we will continue to co-operate fully with the Government and the regulator.
“RedBird IMI are entirely committed to maintaining the existing editorial team of the Telegraph and Spectator publications, and believe that editorial independence for these titles is essential to protecting their reputation and credibility.
“We are excited by the opportunity to support the titles’ existing management to expand the reach of the titles in the UK, the US and other English-speaking countries.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel