SNP MP Pete Wishart was among those left fuming after three seats held by Tory MPs were granted Levelling Up funding while his constituency has so far received nothing.
We previously told how Moray, Dumfries and Galloway and the Borders, represented by Douglas Ross, Alister Jack and David Mundell respectively, were awarded millions of pounds for projects in the latest round of funding.
However, SNP minister and Moray MSP Richard Lochhead pointed out that this was the second time Levelling Up funding had been granted to his area.
He expressed concern that other towns and villages "need their fair share too".
It is also the second time Dumfries and Galloway, held at Westminster by Scottish Secretary Alister Jack, has been awarded the funds.
Wishart, the MP for Perth and North Perthshire took to Twitter/X to express his anger.
He said: “Pork barrel politics at its most gratuitous. Perthshire has not received a penny in all three rounds of levelling up which surely tells us they’ve all but given up here…”
Wishart’s comments echoed those of SNP president Michael Russell, who said public money is “being used to try and buy electoral advantage”.
READ MORE: Midlothian: Conservative councillors abstain from Gaza ceasefire vote
“There is no longer Levelling Up, this is pure naked pork-barrel politics with public money being used to try and buy electoral advantage.”
During a debate on the funding on Monday, former SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford also shared concerns about a lack of funding for his area - Ross, Skye and Lochaber.
He told the Commons: "Once again, there is nothing for Ross, Skye and Lochaber. We heard from [David Mundell] about the importance of rural areas, but there is nothing for the Portree harbour bid, that would have made such a difference.
"I want to invite the Cabinet Secretary and his ministerial team to come to my constituency and we'll drive around and we'll look at all the signs of the projects that were funded by the European Union - roads, bridges, harbours, sports facilities.
"Money that would have come if we had stayed in the European Union as Scotland had voted to. £750 billion Euros that the EU was investing in regeneration. That's what we're missing out on and once again we're getting nothing, nothing, zip all from this Tory government."
The projects to receive Levelling Up funding include:
- Dumfries and Galloway (with Scottish Borders and South Lanarkshire) - Three Rivers Active Tourism Project -£22,809,416
- Glasgow City - Drumchapel Town Centre Regeneration - £14,979,646
- Dumfries and Galloway - Dumfries and Galloway Transport Bid - £13,752,000
- Moray - Elgin City Centre Masterplan: Levelling Up Moray - £18,291,000
- South Lanarkshire - National Business District: Shawfield - Remediation and Development - £14,637,600
- North Ayrshire (with South Ayrshire) - Levelling Up For Ayrshire: Commercial and Low Carbon Infrastructure - £37,456,821
Other decisions in the latest round of funding have also attracted criticism, including the £15 million given to the regeneration of Drumchapel town centre.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf calls on Rishi Sunak to recognise State of Palestine
Labour MSP Paul Sweeney said: “Whilst this is good news for Drumchapel, if we take a Glasgow-wide view I don’t think it’s the top priority for capital investment in the city and it’s deeply disappointing that there’s been minimal consultation with parliamentary representatives about what’s the best investment for Glasgow.”
The MSP had previously thrown his weight behind a funding bid to renovate Springburn Winter Gardens.
Levelling Up Secretary Michael Gove said: “Levelling up means delivering local people’s priorities and bringing transformational change in communities that have, for too long, been overlooked and undervalued.
“Today we are backing 55 projects across the UK with £1 billion to create new jobs and opportunities, power economic growth and revitalise local areas.
“This funding sits alongside our wider initiatives to spread growth, through devolving more money and power out of Westminster to towns and cities, putting in place bespoke interventions to places that need it most, and our Long-Term Plan for Towns.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel