LEE Anderson has suggested that asylum seekers should be sent to “some remote Scottish island” if the UK Government’s Rwanda deportation plan fails.
The MP called for those arriving in the UK via small boats to be housed in the Orkney Islands, which he claimed would be “perfect” for people fleeing persecution.
When asked about reports the Home Office had considered sending migrants to the Falkland Islands, Anderson (below) told GB News it was a “bit far to go” and “not fair on the islanders”.
He then added that “if people are genuinely escaping war or persecution then a nice Scottish island with a few outbuildings would be suitable”.
His comments come after the Supreme Court ruled Rishi Sunak’s plans to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda were unlawful due to deficiencies in the country’s asylum system.
A report in the Times suggested Sunak had rejected Home Office proposals to send migrants to the Falkland Islands as a back-up.
Anderson continued: “There’s a better option. We can keep them on British soil if you like. We’ve got the Orkneys or some remote Scottish island.
READ MORE: BBC responds to criticism as Gaza ceasefire calls cut from Scottish Baftas
“I know it’s a bit parky up there this time of year. But if people are genuinely escaping war or persecution then a nice Scottish island with a few outbuildings would be suitable.”
He said he thought the UK was “beautiful” and stressed the “go-to” nature of some parts of Scotland.
“I’d like to be able to afford a place up there,” he said.
The Tory deputy chair continued: “The Falkland Islands, I think it’s a little bit far to go and it’s not fair on the Falkland Islanders who have got their own problems at the moment with their sovereignty, with Argentina.
“But if people are genuinely escaping violence or persecution then a nice little island in the north of Scotland is perfect.”
He previously said the Rwanda ruling was a “dark day for the British people” and said ministers should “just put the planes in the air now and send them to Rwanda”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel