A GLASGOW councillor is calling on the Scottish Government to provide more funding to maintain the city's Clyde Tunnel — or tolls could be required.
Councillor Ruairi Kelly, SNP, has written to the cabinet secretary for transport, Màiri McAllan, to highlight financial pressures on the city’s road network.
His letter follows a report from council officials which revealed current investment in Glasgow’s roads infrastructure “falls short” of what is needed to keep the current condition by £11.2 million.
Officials said the 60-year-old tunnel requires “significant investment to address necessary repairs” — and recommended spending £16m on the structure.
The funding received for operation and maintenance is “the same amount per kilometre as for a standard stretch of road”, which an official said “isn’t sufficient for the specific requirements of the tunnel”. It has been estimated this leads to an annual shortfall of around £820,000.
Kelly, city convener for neighbourhood services and assets, said he had pointed out “discrepancies” in funding settlements for Glasgow, adding he believes the Clyde Tunnel is of “national significance”.
He wants the tunnel to be funded like a trunk road, which are maintained by Transport Scotland, and said the alternative would be to consider tolling. Introducing a toll has previously been presented as an option during budget setting processes but has never been taken.
Speaking at a council meeting, Kelly said: “The funding doesn’t really take into account the usage of the roads. The Clyde Tunnel gets approximately 65,000 cars through it a day.
READ MORE: Grangemouth oil refinery closure makes Scotland 'more reliant' on England
“There will be other sections of road that get the same funding that don’t have that volume of traffic on it in a year. The wear and tear is significantly more in areas of Glasgow due to the population and the number of people that travel across our roads.”
Kelly said austerity, the Covid pandemic, rising inflation and the city’s equal pay settlement had all affected council finances, and savings have often been taken from neighbourhood services.
He also highlighted the need for funding to replace street lighting columns in Glasgow — with 41% of the city’s 74,000 beyond their expected service life — and how maintenance of new cycle and footways adds to budget pressures. He said he is working with council officials to identify investment.
Top priorities for the tunnel include improving the pedestrian and cycling routes, repairing the ventilation system and a power system upgrade.
Councillor Cecilia O’Lone, Labour, said it is “going to be a major issue”. “As the main road through Glasgow, if that goes our infrastructure is going to fall round about it as well,” she added.
Her Labour colleague, councillor Stephen Docherty, said there had been a “chronic lack of investment” in councils from the Scottish Government.
A council official said a team is “keeping an eye on it [the tunnel] on a regular basis”. It will “make sure there is nothing major and if there is we have to bring that to the attention of our capital planning board”.
The Scottish Government spokesman said: “While Scotland is facing the most challenging budget settlement since devolution due to ongoing UK Government austerity, this year Glasgow City Council will receive more than £1.5 billion to fund local services which equates to an extra £62.6m on last year.
“Work is also ongoing with COSLA to establish a new fiscal framework for councils through the Verity House Agreement, a landmark agreement that is forging a stronger partnership between the Scottish Government and local councils through the spirit of collaboration and engagement.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here