EIGHT BBC journalists have accused the corporation of failing to accurately report on the Israel-Hamas conflict in a scathing letter.
In a 2300-word letter sent to Al Jazeera, the UK-based reporters said the BBC is guilty of “double standards in how civilians are seen” given it is “unflinching” in its reporting of alleged Russian war crimes in Ukraine.
The letter accuses the BBC of investing more effort in humanising Israeli victims compared with Palestinians, and omitting key historical context in coverage.
The group apparently does not plan to send the letter to BBC executives.
READ MORE: Ex-BBC editor intervenes in row over Gaza ceasefire calls at Scottish Baftas
The letter reads: "The BBC has failed to accurately tell this story – through omission and lack of critical engagement with Israel’s claims – and it has therefore failed to help the public engage with and understand the human rights abuses unfolding in Gaza.
“Thousands of Palestinians have been killed since October 7. When will the number be high enough for our editorial stance to change?”
It comes after the BBC edited out multiple calls for a ceasefire in Gaza from the Scottish Bafta Awards ceremony on iPlayer.
Israel declared war against Hamas after the militant group attacked southern Israel on October 7, killing about 1200 Israelis and taking more than 200 hostage.
More than 14,500 Palestinians have been reported as killed by Israeli bombardment.
A four-day pause in fighting has been agreed this week, but has been delayed after being due to start on Thursday morning.
The BBC journalists said that across BBC platforms, terms like “massacre” and “atrocity”, have been reserved “only for Hamas, framing the group as the only instigator and perpetrator of violence in the region. This is inaccurate but aligns with the BBC’s overall coverage”.
READ MORE: SNP General Election candidate quits one month after selection
The letter says the Hamas assault was "appalling" but "does not justify the indiscriminate killing of thousands of Palestinian civilians, and the BBC cannot be seen to support – or fail to interrogate – the logic that it does".
It goes on: "We are asking the BBC to better reflect and defer to the evidence-based findings of official and unbiased humanitarian organisations.”
The journalists said the broadcaster portrays Israeli suffering by telling audiences the names of victims, covering individual funerals, and interviewing affected families.
They said: “In comparison, humanising coverage of Palestinian civilians has been lacking. It is a poor excuse to say that the BBC could not better cover stories in Gaza because of difficulties gaining access to the [Gaza] Strip.
"This is achieved, for example, by telling and following individual stories across weeks. Little attempt has also been made to fully utilise the abundance of social media content from brave journalists in Gaza and the West Bank.”
They acknowledged “some strong isolated examples”, but said sensitively told stories about Palestinians were not “consistent”.
One of the co-writers of the letter told Al Jazeera "this organisation does not represent us".
“For me, and definitely for other people of colour, we can see blatantly that certain civilian lives are considered more worthy than others – that there is some sort of hierarchy at play," they said.
The letter also claims that the BBC is failing to provide audiences with important background about Israel’s occupation and the history of Palestinian suffering.
It said: “For Israel’s bombardment to be considered ‘self-defence’, events must begin with the Hamas-led attack.
“News updates and articles neglect to include a line or two of critical historical context – on 75 years of occupation, the Nakba, or the asymmetric death toll across decades.”
“The BBC has often called the ongoing conflict ‘complex’. It is no more complex than any other conflict.
“It is our job to cut through rhetoric and misinformation; to explain what is happening and what has led to this.”
The BBC has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel