HUMZA Yousaf has called out “hypocrisy” from the Scottish Tory leader over his criticism of Michael Matheson’s £11k iPad expenses.
The First Minister faced extensive questioning on the Health Secretary’s data roaming expenses during FMQs, from both Douglas Ross and Anas Sarwar.
Amid a challenge from Ross, Yousaf took the opportunity to criticise the MSP’s own approach to financial declarations.
In 2021, Ross failed to declare his £21,000 Holyrood salary to Westminster authorities – and also failed to declare income from 26 football games he ran the line at. In total more than £28,000 of income was not declared to the House.
Ross said he “doesn’t know why” he failed to disclose the cash and apologised for the “extremely bad” error.
At FMQs on Thursday, Yousaf read out an apologetic interview to STV – then revealed the quotes were from Ross at the time.
“’This was a big mistake by me for something I’m deeply sorry, I know how badly I’ve performed here and how much I’ve let people down. And for that I’m very sorry’,” the SNP leader quoted.
“Forgive me, this was a quote from Douglas Ross when he failed to declare £28k of income,” Yousaf said.
“Now, the point here is we didn’t call for Douglas Ross to quit. We accepted, of course, the point that he had made an honest mistake. And the hypocrisy here … is that Douglas Ross says it’s fine for him to make an honest mistake but not fine for Michael Matheson to make an honest mistake.
“So we will not get distracted by Douglas Ross’s political opportunism, the Health Secretary is getting on with the job of making sure the health service recovers through what will be a difficult winter.”
The exchange came as it emerged that Matheson is to be investigated by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) over the expenses row.
Matheson admitted last week in an emotional statement to MSPs his teenage sons had used his parliamentary iPad as a hotspot to watch football during a holiday in January, incurring costs of more than £7000 in one day as a result of an out of date Sim card.
READ MORE: UK monetary union 'malfunctioning' after Scotland agrees new deal
Following a failed challenge over the bill to provider EE, Matheson initially agreed to pay £3000 from his own expenses and the remaining balance was paid by his office – all of which is funded by taxpayers.
But following press reports about the bill, he said he would cover the full cost personally.
Matheson previously told journalists there had been no personal use of the iPad during the trip, prompting accusations he had been untruthful as he said in his statement in Holyrood that he did not initially provide the reasons for the bill when he found out earlier this month in order to protect his family.
Following significant pressure from opposition politicians, Matheson referred himself to the SPCB – but was told this was not possible.
In the latest twist in the saga, the body announced on Thursday it will undertake an investigation of the Health Secretary and potentially refer him to the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel