THE BBC has dismissed a complaint about a broadcast of The Sunday Show which featured a former Scottish Labour councillor – without identifying him as such.
Professor Richard Kerley had appeared on the BBC Scotland programme on October 1 where he discussed plans for the Labour-run North Lanarkshire Council to close 39 facilities such as nurseries, libraries and leisure centres.
Kerley, considered one of the foremost experts on local government in Scotland, was a Labour councillor in the 1980s and stood for a Westminster seat in the 1983 General Election.
The BBC said that failure to identify him as a former Labour politician was not a breach of impartiality guidelines because “records show it is forty years since he last stood for election”.
READ MORE: BBC Scotland editor changes Grangemouth report over 'incorrect' data
A summary of the complaint submitted to the broadcaster said: “A viewer complained that the programme failed to make clear that a guest, billed as an ‘expert on local government’, had also been a Labour local councillor.
“The ECU [executive complaints unit] assessed whether the output met the standards of accuracy and impartiality set out in the BBC Editorial Guidelines.”
The ECU’s conclusion read: “The guidelines say BBC output ‘should not automatically assume that contributors from other organisations (such as academics, journalists, researchers and representatives of charities and think-tanks) are unbiased. Appropriate information about their affiliations, funding and particular viewpoints should be made available to the audience, when relevant to the context’.
“The guest in this instance, Professor Richard Kerley, is primarily known as one of Scotland’s leading experts in public sector administration and records show it is forty years since he last stood for election. The ECU did not consider therefore that misleading for viewers or lacking in impartiality.”
Kerley’s appearance on the Sunday Show had been flagged by the @msm_monitor social media account. Writing on October 1, the account said: “Kerley isn't just a former Labour councillor, he has maintained strong links to Scottish Labour for decades.
“He has been presented as non-political by BBC Scotland for years. The broadcaster has many such 'impartial' guests who appear again and again.”
READ MORE: Drug reform experts condemn Tory minister after SNP 'heroin' comments
Alongside Labour figures including Anas Sarwar, Kezia Dugdale, and Sarah Boyack, Kerley did contribute to a paper by the Labour-linked Scottish Fabians think tank in 2013, something also flagged by the @msm_monitor account.
Kerley’s contribution focused on how to improve public services. He called for “a future Scottish Government to introduce and implement ‘policy impact audits’ for all future policy developments and legislative initiatives”.
He added: “Our public services – our Welfare State – have much complexity and often address hard to reconcile, even if desirable, objectives. Change here is not simply about cost and affordability – though both are important – but whether what we think we are achieving is actually being achieved. It is often not; and we could do better.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here