THE Prime Minister has been warned that failure to remove VAT for sunscreen products will result in more cases of melanoma skin cancer.
The SNP MP Amy Callaghan (below) – who is herself a skin cancer survivor – wrote to Rishi Sunak urging him to make high-factor sun protection more accessible.
She said that cases of melanoma, which is caused by ultraviolet light from the sun and in some cases sunbeds, have more than doubled in the last 25 years with 17,000 new cases and 2300 deaths each year.
In the letter signatories pointed towards research showing that 67% of people would use sunscreen more if it was 20% cheaper.
The UK Government has previously claimed that sunscreen is already available on prescription for people with certain medical conditions.
However, the letter highlight that this provision is “extremely limited” and does not include melanoma patients.
“With every day the UK government refuses to act, more people are diagnosed with melanoma.
“It is now one of the most lethal cancers for people aged between 15 and 34, and the number of cases are expected to hit almost 20,000 by 2025.
“I know first-hand how devastating it is to receive a melanoma diagnosis, and it’s even more tragic because this horrific disease is almost entirely preventable by staying safe in the sun.
“But we know from polling that most people think sunscreen is too expensive, and they would use it more if it was cheaper.
READ MORE: Lawyers call for explanation of why SNP finance probe taking so long
“That is why everyone who has signed this letter is calling on the UK government to remove VAT from sunscreen, and to launch a public-awareness campaign like Australia’s successful ‘Slip, Slop, Slap’.
“With treasury ministers refusing to even entertain the idea, it’s time for the Prime Minister to step in and do the right thing, make sunscreen exempt from VAT, and ultimately save lives.”
The treatment of skin cancer costs the NHS more than £500 million a year across the UK, while the cost of removing VAT from sunscreen is estimated to be around £60 million.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel