THE UK Government did not “communicate everything” to Scottish ministers during the pandemic - including one of the key changes in public health messaging, Michael Gove has admitted.
The Levelling Up Secretary said he was sure there would have been “failures” in what was communicated to the Scottish Government and other devolved administrations “at times”.
In May 2020, then Prime Minister Boris Johnson replaced the direction to ‘Stay Home’ to ‘Stay Alert’ to help control the spread of the virus.
READ MORE: Covid inquiry: Michael Gove says UK was ‘not well enough prepared’
It sparked huge criticism – particularly as it was initially unveiled in a newspaper report - and the devolved governments chose to stick to the original message.
Gove, who was Cabinet Office minister and chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster when the pandemic began in 2020, said he “did not believe” the Scottish Government was informed in advance of the change.
But he said he didn’t think it resulted in” any particular detriment” to the handling of the pandemic.
Hugo Keith KC, counsel to the inquiry, then pressed him on why “perhaps one of the most important changes in public messaging” during the crisis had not been communicated to the Scottish Government first.
Gove responded: “We communicated a great deal, we didn’t communicate everything to the Scottish Government.
“And I want to be fair – the first thing is there will, I am sure, have been failures in what we communicated to the Scottish Government and other devolved administrations at times.”
He went on: “But it is also the case that the Scottish Government – and I admire the way in which Nicola Sturgeon handled Covid generally – but the Scottish Government is led by a political party that has a desire to generate a particular point, causes for grievance or objection to the UK Government’s constitutional position and policy position.
READ MORE: Tory peer called out for ignoring devolution at Covid Inquiry
“So it will be the case that there will be a temptation for some in the Scottish Government and in the Scottish National Party to exaggerate the impact of a mistake or an error in order to feed a broader political mission.”
Keith asked the UK minister if he acknowledged that the devolved leaders of the time - Sturgeon, Mark Drakeford and Arlene Forster – all “robustly reject” any notion they acted for political motives.
Gove responded: “I do. But I also think that, again it is a matter of fact, that Mark Drakeford and Arlene Forster belong to political parties that believe in the maintenance of the United Kingdom and Nicola Sturgeon does not.”
However Claire Mitchell KC, representing the Scottish Covid Bereaved, later quizzed him on a document in which she said it appears he was suggesting that the UK Government considers that the pandemic was an “opportunity to emphasise the strength of the Union” and that a “political point could be made”.
She went on: “Was it in fact the UK Government playing politics with the pandemic response?”
Gove denied this was the case, saying: “It is the case that the strength of the United Kingdom in dealing with the pandemic was a material benefit to all the countries within the United Kingdom.”
Mitchell also stated there was a lack of clarity in whether policy applied across the whole of the UK, or exclusively in England.
She continued: "There was little attempt to outline what applied UK-wide.
"The phrase 'this country' was employed frequently to mean Great Britain or the UK.
"There wasn't clarity."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel