MORE than a third of people want to replace King Charles with an elected head of state, according to a new poll.
People’s preference for the monarchy stands at 52% versus 34% of people who want to ditch the institution, research by Savanta has found.
Campaign group Republic said support for getting rid of the monarchy was now at “record” levels.
Polling by another firm, Ipsos, in May found support for Britain becoming a republic was at the then-record high of 28%.
Graham Smith, the group’s chief executive, said: “This is a watershed moment for the anti-monarchy movement, with 1 in 3 now wanting to elect their head of state."
"Polling since the start of the year has consistently shown a big drop in support for the monarchy over the past decade."
"2023 was supposed to be the year the royals secure their future."
He branded the coronation a “PR extravaganza” to “manage the transition from Elizabeth to Charles” after the late Queen’s death and her son’s ascent to the throne.
READ MORE: Support for republic at all-time high, new poll finds
Smith added: “The royals were able to rely on more friendly media coverage than they could ever hope for, and a cavalcade of important people lining up to talk up its greatness, history, importance and necessity.
"Yet all that effort and expense has failed to shift the dial in their favour, instead the year ends with a record number wanting to elect the UK's head of state.
"With one in three people now preferring a republic this issue has to be addressed seriously by politicians and media.
“We are not a nation of royalists, and in time we will become a nation that overwhelmingly wants the monarchy gone."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel