SNP MP Deidre Brock grilled Rishi Sunak at PMQs on Wednesday over NHS England’s awarding of an IT contract to US tech firm Palantir.
It was previously announced that the contract for the “federated data platform” – valued by the NHS at £330 million – was awarded to the tech firm despite concerns from privacy campaigners.
The platform will help NHS trusts manage data in their hospitals, connecting up information held by different trusts and allowing the health service to draw conclusions about population health.
It is also intended to help individual hospitals manage their data better and drive improvements in treatment and waiting times.
📣 SNP’s @DeidreBrock raised a very important question at #PMQs about the awarding of NHS England contracts to the US spy tech company Palantir.
— Olaf Stando 🌻 (@OlafSNP) November 29, 2023
In Scotland, the SNP is committed to keeping our NHS firmly in public hands and rejecting the Tory privatisation agenda. pic.twitter.com/gt0seFfdyH
It is not intended to cover GP medical records at this stage.
Following the award of the contract, Amnesty International called for the UK Government to require Palantir to “give cast-iron guarantees that they won’t monetise health data collected from the NHS”.
The firm’s founder Peter Thiel is a backer of Donald Trump and previously claimed the UK has “Stockholm syndrome” when it comes to the health service.
Speaking at PMQs on Wednesday, Brock asked Sunak: “NHS England has awarded £330m to Palantir, a controversial technology firm, to help it recover from its pandemic backlog despite deep concerns among many healthcare professionals about privacy, ethics and the safety of patient data.
READ MORE: Scottish independence poll: 54% back Yes in new Ipsos survey
“In light of the Government’s recently commissioned report on unifying health data in the UK, can the Prime Minster confirm that no attempts will be made to force the Scottish Government to release the personal data of Scottish residents to any centralised system.”
In response, Sunak said that health was a devolved issue but that the UK “would look for every opportunity to improve patient care”.
“That’s what we’re doing, developing new technology which has had a proven track record in bringing down waiting lists and improving the optimisation efficiency of how theatres are scheduled.
“That’s the type of thing that we need to do to ensure patients get the care they need and we can get efficiency in the NHS.”
Earlier this year, a spokesperson for Palantir said: “Whether our support for the Covid vaccine rollout, the 28% waiting list reduction we’ve helped deliver at Chelsea and Westminster NHS foundation trust, or the development of software proved to help speed up cancer diagnosis, data privacy and security are always paramount in all of our work.
READ MORE: Scots pastor claims comments about Humza Yousaf were 'twisted'
“As a software company, we don’t collect or monetise data – we simply provide the tools to help customers organise and understand their own information.
“And precisely because our software is used in some of the most sensitive information environments in the world, it is built to ensure data-sharing is controlled, auditable and in accordance with customer-defined purposes only.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel