A STANDARDS investigation into Stephen Flynn allegedly misusing official stationery has concluded by dismissing the complaint.
The SNP Westminster leader was reported to House of Commons authorities in July after a PR stunt which saw his team hand out mugs stuffed with official parliament compliments slips criticising Labour.
It came amid a row over Keir Starmer’s refusal to commit to repealing the two-child benefit cap should he come to power after the next election.
The policy has previously been compared with China’s one child policy and the SNP handed out mugs in the Westminster press gallery which read: “Controls on family sizes. What’s the point of Labour?”
The matter was investigated by the Standards Committee, which published its report on Thursday and dismissed the complaint.
MPs are entitled to use official stationery for parliamentary purposes but not party political campaigning – a line the complaint against Flynn said he had crossed.
The matter was initially referred to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards who then passed it to the committee after Flynn disputed the commissioner’s findings he had broken the rules.
The commissioner argued the slogan on the mug was an “eye-catching way to put across a party-political message”.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn targets Labour in genius pre-PMQs stunt
But Flynn said that such an interpretation would “create a world where boring politics is good, but eye-catching and engaging politics to put forwards a message of importance to my constituents is not”.
The committee report said: “We do not believe that in Mr Flynn’s case issues of great moment are engaged, and we regret that it did not prove possible to conclude this matter at an earlier stage without the need for a formal referral to the committee.
“We take the opportunity to draw members’ attention to the requirement in the stationery rules that house-provided resources should not be used for party political campaigning, but do not consider it would be proportionate for us to take any further action in this particular case.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel