SCOTLAND already has a Foreign Secretary and they sit in the UK Cabinet.
That is the common refrain when the Foreign Office is criticised for putting the fetters on the Scottish Government’s international engagement.
But the SNP are challenging these restrictions – which have included UK ministers holding follow-up meetings with foreign officials who have met with Scotland’s External Affairs Secretary Angus Robertson (below) – by appointing one MP as the country's unofficial diplomat.
Chris Law was appointed as the party’s first international engagement ambassador in March and has told how he is using the role as a chance to circumvent the Foreign Office’s attempts to curtail Scotland’s presence on the world stage – with the freedom to talk about independence as much as he wants.
'Unionist culture war against Scotland'
He branded the Foreign Office’s restrictions a “Unionist culture war against Scotland’s interests in the world”.
Ahead of a trip to Dubai to attend COP28, Law told The National how he was able to meet with government ministers, officials and opposition politicians from across the world without running into the same barriers as his colleague Angus Robertson at the Scottish Government, such as the UK's ban on speaking about independence.
He said he has had meetings with “high-level delegations”, using the advantages Westminster afforded in location and prominence for receiving guests from abroad.
Because foreign affairs are reserved to Westminster, Law said it was easier for him to meet with foreign politicians regularly than it would be in Holyrood.
Global clout
But he added that Scotland’s strong global brand gave it outsized clout on the world stage.
“It really struck me how when I met people from different nations and they found out you’re from Scotland and not only had a distinctive voice but also things to say on climate,” he said.
“For example, we were the first country in the world to set up a climate justice fund back in 2012 and that’s recognised on the world stage, yet as a UK delegate, often gets lost in either the UK Government or official opposition language.”
Law (above) argued Scotland could be “crowded out” without a physical presence at meetings and conferences like COP and insisted overseas governments had “quite an interest in Scotland way beyond the constitution, which is what the UK Government worries about the most”.
“It’s really frustrating that you have a UK Government that is hellbent on trying to narrow Scotland’s interests overseas, not least given the kind of exports we have globally, not least the direct foreign investment we have in Scotland,” he said.
“It cannot be right that the Scottish Government can only act very specifically within devolved areas.”
READ MORE: Westminster 'planning further crackdown on Scottish Government global activities'
“We are a family of nations and there are differing views across it and for devolution to truly work that allows for ideas and policies to be framed within those nations. And the idea that somehow you can all fit under one umbrella ‘Team GB’, it’s misleading for anybody that’s interested.”
The Foreign Office has tightened the screws on the Scottish Government’s foreign affairs work, arguing that the External Affairs Secretary was regularly overstepping the bounds of devolution by discussing reserved matters with international politicians.
Robertson has countered that the UK Government is “actively undermining” Scotland and argued that ministers had “frequently diluted” the Scottish brand as part of a “UK offering”.
He told the Scottish Affairs Committee earlier this month a joint reception hosted by him and the Foreign Office in Paris last year had to be cancelled when the Scotland Office insisted on its event at the same venue being the only one to go ahead.
The UK Government was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel