KING Charles has been slammed as a “climate change hypocrite” after making a speech to Cop28 calling for “transformational action” when he is one of the UK’s biggest polluters.
The monarch told heads of state, heads of government and business and climate delegates at the summit in Dubai that the dangers of climate change are “no longer distant risks” and that nature was being taken into “dangerous, uncharted territory”.
Anti-monarchy campaigners said following the speech at Expo City Dubai that Charles’s “huge carbon footprint” from helicopter and private jet flights, as well as maintaining numerous large properties, make him a hypocrite.
READ MORE: John Byrne: Legendary Scottish artist dies at 83
Campaign group Republic pointed out that despite painting himself as an environmentalist, Charles’s carbon footprint will “dwarf” that of ordinary citizens.
In his speech, the monarch said he hoped the summit would be “another critical turning point” towards change when “alarming tipping points are being reached”.
“Despite all the attention, there is 30% more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere now than there was back then, and almost 40% more methane,” he said.
“Some important progress has been made, but it worries me greatly that we remain so dreadfully far off track as the global stocktake report demonstrates so graphically.
“The dangers are no longer distant risks. I have seen across the Commonwealth, and beyond, countless communities which are unable to withstand repeated shocks, whose lives and livelihoods are laid waste by climate change.
“Surely, real action is required to stem the growing toll of its most vulnerable victims.”
In 2022, it emerged that the late Queen Elizabeth’s lawyers had secretly lobbied for the Royal Family to be immune from parts of a major Scottish law cutting carbon emissions.
According to climate group The Eco Experts, the Royal Family has a carbon footprint of 3810 tonnes of CO2 equivalent (tCO2e) each year, with Charles’s personal footprint estimated to be 423.3 tonnes. The average UK resident's carbon footprint is 11.7 tCO2e.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon put 'political angle' on Scottish Covid rules, says Hancock
Graham Smith, CEO of Republic, said that Charles is “playing at environmentalism”.
“While churning out a huge carbon footprint with regular flights by helicopter and private jet, maintaining several huge homes and living a luxury, high-carbon lifestyle,” he said.
"We need an elected head of state, someone who can speak sincerely and intelligently about the crisis facing the planet, not someone who plays at environmentalism as a prop to promote his own credentials."
The Cop28 summit is the first time countries will conduct a “global stocktake” of progress made since the Paris Agreement in 2015, where states agreed to limit the average global temperature rise to 2C above pre-industrial levels and aim to stop it from rising above 1.5C.
But the United Nations has warned that the planet is on course for a catastrophic 3C increase by the end of the century under current climate policies, despite efforts.
Republic pointed out that for this to be achieved the biggest, and richest, polluters will have to make significant changes.
"Tackling climate change means tackling those who produce the biggest carbon footprints, which means the richest countries and the richest people,” Smith (above) added.
"Charles is one of the super rich whose carbon footprint dwarfs that of ordinary people.
READ MORE: How this SNP MP avoids Tory restrictions on Scotland's work abroad
"By allowing Charles off the hook, by letting him play the environmentalist, we are being distracted from the real issues that are impacting the environment.
"On the environment Charles should be in the dock, not on the witness stand."
During his trip to Cop28, Charles held bilateral talks with the Amir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al Thani, and the president of Israel, Isaac Herzog.
He also met the French president, Emmanuel Macron, and President Lula of Brazil, who is the president-elect of Cop30 in Belem in 2025.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel