KEIR Starmer has denied he will take the country towards a “Thatcherite future” – as he insisted he is “not in the business of cutting funding”.
The Labour leader said austerity was the “path [the Tories] take” as he defended Labour’s high-spending previous spells in Government.
It comes after SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn accused Starmer of wanting to take the country into a “Thatcherite future”.
Speaking at the think tank Resolution Foundation’s conference in London on Monday, the Labour leader also defended watering down a major green spending commitment.
Starmer argued the NHS was in need of “reform” if it was to survive into the future but suggested this would not involve cutting its budget.
He said: “I’m certainly not in the business of cutting the funding which is why is the focus is so much on growth.
“What I would say though is that we must never forget that our public services need reform.”
The NHS must make greater use of “data and AI” and should focus on preventing people from getting sick rather than only treating people when they become ill, he argued.
Starmer (above) said: “If it’s to last another 75 years – and I want it to, I believe in it and I’m determined that it will – then it’s got to change, it’s got to become preventative, it’s got to be closer to people and their communities. We’ve got to make much more use of data and AI.
“On public services, yes there’s the question of how much money we put in, but there is equally the question of whether you’ve got the wherewithal to carry out the reform that is desperately needed.”
READ MORE: Keir Starmer 'appeasing billionaire right-wing press' with Margaret Thatcher praise
He suggested this would not result in spending cuts, however, noting that Labour governments have previously increased public spending while in office.
Starmer added: “If you look at the record of Labour in government, what you see is a record of investing in our public services. The austerity is something of this Government, that is the road down which they walk.”
However, in his speech he warned Labour would not “quickly turn on the spending taps” if they form the next Government, adding: “But at the same time, we will be ruthless when it comes to spending every pound wisely.”
He went on: “I have said to every member of my shadow cabinet, when they are drawing up their plans for our manifesto.
“Think carefully about how precious every pound is for the people we must serve.
“Hold them in your minds’ eye and approach the public finances – spending decisions – like it’s their money. Because at the end of the day: it is.”
His speech to mark the launch of a new report into the UK’s economic malaise by the progressive think tank the Resolution Foundation came after he wrote a piece for the Sunday Telegraph which said Margaret Thatcher had wanted to “drag Britain out of its stupor by setting loose our natural entrepreneurialism”.
Many took the remark to be in praise of the former prime minister – something he rejected on Monday.
Starmer said: “It doesn’t mean I agree with what she did, but you don’t have to agree with someone to recognise they had a mission and a plan, in her particular case, about entrepreneurship.”
But Flynn (above) – who has regularly used his time at PMQs to criticise Labour as much as the Tories – said the speech showed Starmer’s values were “far, far removed from Scotland’s values”.
The SNP’s Westminster leader added: “Austerity, Brexit and Margaret Thatcher – these are the values that motivate Westminster politicians like Sir Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak, and Scotland wants none of it.”
He was also grilled about Labour’s watered-down green spending plans, which were initially worth £28 billion spending plans and are now a target for around 2026, should Labour come to power next year.
The plans were absent from his speech – despite its focus on economic growth – but Starmer said growth was not only to do with investment but also planning and regulation.
He said: “The £28bn, we will ramp up to that in the second half of the [next] parliament and it will be used to trigger that other investment from the private sector.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel