SCOTTISH LibDem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton must be ordered to explain why he dialled into a Holyrood debate from outside the parliamentary bar, an MSP has insisted.
The party chief has been slammed for using his phone to raise a point of order remotely when he appeared to be a matter of seconds away at Margo’s bar.
MSPs jeered when he appeared on the screen with his shirt unbuttoned as he apologised for being “unable to connect” while repeatedly touching his hair.
He dialled in just after votes had been cast on Labour MSP Pam Duncan-Glancy’s Proposed Disabled Children and Young People (Transitions to Adulthood) (Scotland) Bill.
SNP MSP John Mason has now called on Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone to seek an explanation and apology from Cole-Hamilton.
READ MORE: University of Aberdeen: Thousands sign petition to save languages degrees
Mason said in the past several MSPs have dialled into debates from their offices which he understood was being “clamped down on”, adding that Cole-Hamilton should not think he is “above the rules”.
He told The National: “My understanding was that if MSPs were in the Holyrood building, they should be in the actual Chamber to vote, speak, or take part in any way.
“In the past several MSPs took part remotely from their Holyrood offices and I thought this had been clamped down on.
“As a principle, Holyrood is our workplace and the default position is that MSPs should be in the chamber in person for FMQs, decision time, if they are asking questions, or if they are speaking in a debate.”
Mason stressed that while it is positive MSPs can vote remotely – unlike at Westminster – this is not something that should be abused.
He added: “I do welcome the fact that we can take part remotely, however, that should be for a specific reason, including illness, caring responsibilities, or because of a distant constituency/region.
“None of these would appear to apply to Alex Cole-Hamilton so I hope the Presiding Officer is seeking an explanation and potentially apology from him.
“Being an MSP is a privilege and a responsibility and none of us should think we are above the rules.”
The Scottish Parliament has been approached for a response.
READ MORE: Scottish councils to monitor second homes turned into short-term lets
The Sun reported Cole-Hamilton had been at the bar with a staffer following a meeting. It is not known whether the LibDem leader had been drinking.
Deputy Presiding Officer Liam McArthur looked confused throughout the exchange as Cole-Hamilton struggled with his connection.
Shouts of “disgrace” and “the shame” could be heard in the chamber when he spoke while one politician could be overheard telling ex-LibDem leader Willie Rennie: “We’d have never got that from you, Willie.”
SNP MP Gavin Newlands speculated that had this behaviour been displayed by a member of his party, they would have faced much worse scrutiny for their actions.
He tweeted: “As an aside, call me an old cynic, but I rather think that if this was an SNP MSP, let alone group leader, that high profile elements of the Scottish media would be going big with this. 'SNP has questions to answer' 'SNP MSP urged to resign,' and so on...”
SNP MP Richard Thomson also criticised Cole-Hamilton for displaying arrogance during the debate.
He said on Twitter: “Remote participation should always add value to Parliamentary proceedings. Sadly, @agcolehamilton demonstrates here the textbook against.
“The very definition of someone who thinks Holyrood is fortunate to have him elected there, rather than the reverse being the case…”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel