FIRST Minister Humza Yousaf had a dig at Alex Cole-Hamilton in Holyrood after the Scottish LibDem leader tried to take part in a debate from outside the parliament bar.
Cole-Hamilton hit the headlines on Monday after reports that he had phoned into a Holyrood session remotely from outside Margo’s bar – less than 60 seconds walk from the chamber.
The Scottish LibDems declined to say if he had been drinking.
The Holyrood authorities have also refused to say if the LibDem MSP will face a probe for his actions, after calls for the presiding officer to seek “an explanation and potentially an apology”.
Deputy presiding officer Liam McArthur – another LibDem MSP – had been presiding during the incident and could be seen to shake his head and question what Cole-Hamilton had been saying.
On Thursday, the Scottish LibDem leader, who with just four MSPs in his group does not get an automatic question at FMQs, stood up to ask Humza Yousaf when the Cabinet would next meet.
The question is often submitted by Cole-Hamilton, as it gets him on the running order and allows him a chance to ask a follow-up.
After he asked his standard first question, an MSP could be heard to say “last orders”.
Yousaf then took his own jab at the LibDem boss.
“Can I say it’s great to see Alex Cole-Hamilton in the Holyrood chamber, presiding officer,” the SNP leader said.
There was laughter among MSPs as Cole-Hamilton stood up, but a malfunctioning microphone meant his full reply was not heard by the chamber.
On Wednesday, The National reported that Scottish Parliament authorities refused to say if any official complaints were made regarding Cole-Hamilton’s conduct in the Holyrood chamber, and if the presiding officer has the authority to investigate him.
Previously, the Scottish LibDem leader said of the incident: “I take the proceedings of parliament very seriously. My voting record speaks for itself in casting my ballot every time that I possibly can.
“MSPs regularly vote remotely and on this occasion, fewer than a third were present to vote in person.
“After decision time, I immediately sought out the deputy presiding officer to apologise for not arriving at the chamber in time.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel