THE Cabinet Office has refused to say how many times a committee on the Union has met while Rishi Sunak has been Prime Minister.
The National lodged a Freedom of Information (FOI) request asking for the number of meetings chaired by the PM and other Cabinet ministers discussing the Union since Sunak took over in Number 10 on October 25 2022.
There is very little information publicly available about the Domestic and Economic Affairs (Union) Cabinet sub-committee, other than that it is chaired by Sunak and other ministers including Scottish Secretary Alister Jack take part in the meetings.
READ MORE: Court ruling on UK's gender reform block due tomorrow
However, the Cabinet Office has refused to even release the number of meetings held, claiming that the information is exempt from disclosure.
SNP MP Tommy Sheppard, who is currently embroiled in a four-year battle with the Cabinet Office over polling regarding attitudes to the Union that they have refused to release, called the response “astonishing”.
A previous FOI request from The National to establish how many times the Union Strategy Committee met under Boris Johnson was also refused in October 2021.
The Cabinet Office claimed in its latest refusal that disclosing how many meetings have been held is exempt because it refers to “ministerial communications”.
They suggested that disclosing the number of meetings would “weaken Minister’s ability to discuss controversial and sensitive topics free from premature public scrutiny”.
Referring to whether or not disclosure would be in the public interest, the Cabinet Office argued that ministers should be able to “discuss policy freely and frankly” and that the “candour of all involved” could be impacted by any disclosure.
The National did not ask for the details of any discussions held, just the number of meetings that had taken place.
“Taking into account all the circumstances of this case,” the response said, “I have concluded that the balance of the public interest favours withholding this information”.
READ MORE: Covid Inquiry: Boris Johnson says he 'loves the SNP'
Sheppard, the SNP’s Scotland spokesperson at Westminster, hit out at the response from the Cabinet Office.
“It’s astonishing, the response reads like it's a template they put out to any request,” he said.
“They haven’t even acknowledged that it’s asking how many times the committee has met, not the content of the meetings.
“The Freedom of Information department should be renamed the Department for Withholding Information.
“It seems to be there to just completely ignore and undermine the principle of Freedom of Information.
“It shows the contempt that they have for it, they are serial offenders.”
Sheppard (above) has been battling the UK Government to release secretive polling on the Union since 2019. The Cabinet Office’s refusal to publish the data it holds was first heard at a First-Tier Tribunal in 2021, which ruled that ministers should release the information - but they still haven’t.
The SNP MP is still awaiting the latest court judgment after the case was taken to an Upper Tribunal in September this year.
READ MORE: Protest planned for Keir Starmer's visit to Scotland over Gaza stance
“It’s not difficult to say if the committee has met, it’s just complete stonewalling,” Sheppard said.
“It should not require a torturous legal procedure to get simple information out of the UK Government.”
The National previously asked the Cabinet Office for details on the Cabinet Union Strategy Committee (CUSC), which replaced the Union Unit after it lost two leaders in the space of two weeks.
Sunak and Michael Gove (above), then minister for intergovernmental relations, and the Secretaries of State for the devolved nations were understood to be members, as well as former prime minister Johnson.
But, officials kept any details about meetings or what content was discussed under wraps.
Eventually, Gove did confirm its existence and that it had met in person after The National probed him on it, but he refused to give any further details.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel