MICHAEL Gove defended a “salty” Conservative Party social media post that attacks Labour with an image of a BBC News presenter unwittingly giving the middle finger during a broadcast.
Asked on Sky’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips on Sky, the Communities Secretary said: “It’s certainly a salty intervention in public debate.
“But I think the important thing to bear in mind is that our political conversation takes place in a variety of different ways, on different platforms, and it’s important both to engage people where they are but also a very powerful point is made is that Labour have nothing to say on the question of illegal migration.
“I think that anyone who has ever looked at my social media will see that I am no social media ninja. My social media is herbivorous, to put it mildly.
“But on social media you have a lively debate and that is a powerful contribution to a very lively debate.”
Gove insisted that top lawyers have said the Government’s new legislation aimed at sending asylum seekers to Rwanda is “sound”.
It comes despite being dealt the fresh blow of a legal assessment for the Tory right concluding the Rwanda legislation is not fit for purpose.
Sir Bill Cash, who has chaired a legal examination being waited on by many in the party, has signalled that the Bill is not “sufficiently watertight” despite Rishi Sunak hoping it will revive his flagship asylum plan.
Gove then suggested his party has had a “relative success” already responding to illegal migration.
Speaking about the proposed legislation, Gove said: “It’s pretty tough actually if you look at what we’re saying.”
He added: “Of course we will look at what any colleague and, indeed, any eminent lawyer says but whether it’s Jonathan Sumption or David Wolfson, they are pretty clear, this law is sound.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel