A LABOUR shadow minister has said her party agrees with a hike in the minimum salary threshold for overseas workers to bring their family members to the UK.
The UK Government announced a five-point plan last week to curb immigration which included hiking the minimum salary needed for skilled overseas workers from £26,200 to 38,700.
The minimum income for family visas has also risen to £38,700 to "ensure people only bring dependants whom they can support financially".
Quizzed about the policy by the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, shadow work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall did not say she disagreed with the level set by the Tories adding that her party had called for an increase to the previous limit of £18,600.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer praise for Margaret Thatcher ‘worst move’ in Scotland
She said: “As I’ve said, we have called for the salary threshold to be increased, we’d like the migration advisory committee to publish the evidence so we can see that in detail, but I think the hole at the heart of the migration plans from this government is that they have failed to deal with the skills in training shortages in this country.
“We need a plan for immigration that works for our economy so we can have a managed and controlled system.”
"Is asking people to have a minimum income of £38,000 to bring families here... the right kind of level?" #BBCLauraK asks about UK family visas
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) December 10, 2023
"We have called for the salary threshold to be increased" says Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall https://t.co/3Z7CARpOBD pic.twitter.com/bSw4qU9ttv
Asked again if she agreed with the level the Tory Government had set, she reiterated: “We have called for that [salary threshold] to increase.”
SNP MP and home affairs spokesperson Alison Thewliss said Labour signing up to the policy showed how “out of touch” the party was with Scotland’s needs, adding many of her constituents have been distressed by the “cruel” move.
She said: “This policy is both morally disgraceful and economically destructive - it shows more than ever that Westminster does not work for Scotland.
“Labour signing up to this disastrous policy shows how out of touch with the needs of Scotland they truly are - these measures are the absolute last thing Scotland's economy and public services need.
READ MORE: Tory right deliver legal blow to Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda plan
“I’ve had constituents incredibly upset by what this will mean for them. Many are distressed by this cruel policy, which puts a price on their relationships and will keep families apart.
“Westminster's ideological obsession with cutting immigration is damaging Scotland.”
Thewliss added on Twitter/X the attitude Kendall had shown was "thoroughly depressing".
Elsewhere in the plans, overseas care workers will not be able to bring family dependants, to end the "abuse of the health and care visa".
Home Secretary James Cleverly claimed 300,000 people who were eligible to come to the UK last year would not be able to in future with this plan in place.
Rishi Sunak also leapt to a desperate defence of the Government’s Rwanda plan last week as he said claiming asylum would be “blocked” for people who cross the Channel in small boats.
He insisted that Robert Jenrick, who quit as immigration minister over the plan claiming it “did not go far enough”, was wrong to say the bill wouldn’t work.
The UK’s highest court rejected the Government’s plan last month after judges found there was a real risk of deported refugees having their claims in the east African country wrongly assessed or being returned to their country of origin to face persecution.
Emergency legislation to force decision makers to consider Rwanda is a safe country will be debated by MPs on Tuesday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel