DAVID Cameron is “unaccountable” to MPs as the Israel-Hamas conflict escalates, Labour has claimed.
The Foreign Secretary faced continued criticism from shadow foreign secretary David Lammy, who pointed out his counterpart could not appear before MPs as the war in the Middle East risked becoming “still even worse”.
But Andrew Mitchell (below), Lord Cameron’s deputy in the House of Commons, countered that Lammy was “in almost continuous contact” with the Foreign Secretary, joking he could only be closer if they were in a civil partnership.
Labour frontbencher Lammy told MPs: “Another day where the Foreign Secretary is unaccountable in the middle of a war that could get still even worse. West Bank violence is rising, Hezbollah have attacked Israeli positions and Israeli air strikes have hit towns in south Lebanon.
“A widening in this conflict is in no-one’s interests, and all parties must show restraint.
“While [Lord Cameron] is absent from this place, what steps is the Foreign Secretary taking to prepare for further escalation and deter all parties from full-blown regional war?”
Foreign Office minister Mitchell responded: “I fully understand that [Lammy] wishes to have close contact with Lord Cameron as the Foreign Secretary. But he will be aware that he is in almost continuous contact with the Foreign Secretary by text and WhatsApp.
“Indeed, if he was in any closer contact it would probably be a civil partnership.”
Mitchell later said that the Government’s plans for visa bans for Israeli settlers involved in violence in the West Bank Palestinian territories are “moving forward”.
READ MORE: 'Like a game of Where's Wally?': David Cameron slammed for absence amid Gaza question
Imran Hussain, the Labour MP for Bradford East, said: “Over the last year we have seen a dangerous rise in the number of attacks by violent, illegal Israeli settlers against Palestinians and their property.
“Even the United States announced that they would be imposing a travel ban on violent, extremist settlers last week but all the UK Government has been able to announce is that planning is going on.”
Mitchell replied: “While I can’t give a commentary across the House, I can tell him that our plans in that respect are moving forward.”
Elsewhere in the debate, Labour MPs argued Gazan civilians were being killed by Israel in disproportionate numbers, with some calling for a ceasefire.
Labour backbencher Kerry McCarthy asked: “What does Israel having to abide by international law actually look like?”
Andy Slaughter, the Labour member for Hammersmith, added: “The proportionate civilian deaths in Gaza is significantly higher than the average civilian death toll in all conflicts around the world during the 20th century, doesn’t that give the lie to any claims that Israel is avoiding civilian deaths?
“As the death toll in Gaza approaches 20,000, isn’t it time now for the whole international community including the UK to support a ceasefire that protects civilian lives?”
In response Mitchell said: “Britain has made it absolutely clear to the authorities in Israel that we expect them to abide by international humanitarian law and understand and accept the rules of law.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel