FOREIGN leaders have expressed their support for independence on multiple occasions despite the presence of senior Foreign Office officials, according to Nicola Sturgeon’s former chief of staff.
Liz Lloyd, who was also the former first minister’s most senior adviser for six years, wrote in The Times that this included a “prominent foreign prime minister.”
The comments come amid a row over Humza Yousaf’s meeting with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Sunday after Foreign Secretary Lord David Cameron threatened to withhold support for the Scottish Government’s international relations efforts due to a lack of Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office (FCDO) presence.
Speaking on Monday, the First Minister said the letter was “petty and misguided”.
“Scotland is the part of the UK, outside of London, that has attracted the most foreign direct investment for eight years in a row, that happens because the Scottish Government’s international engagement is valued (and) has impact,” he added.
Speaking after the Scottish Affairs Committee meeting on Monday, Alister Jack claimed it happened on four other occasions during Yousaf’s time at the summit.
The Scottish Secretary told MPs there were also meetings with European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen, European Council President Charles Michel, Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati and acting Pakistani Prime Minister Anwar-ul-Haq Kakar.
Addressing the row, Lloyd claimed it was in fact foreign governments who often tried to block UK officials from attending meetings with SNP ministers.
READ MORE: David Cameron criticised following threat over Humza Yousaf meeting at COP28
“It was other countries — not Scotland — who would suggest ways (which we rarely took up) of meeting without a UK presence,” she said – adding: “There was nothing underhand in these proposed conversations, no opinions expressed that the UK would not already be aware of and official minutes and informal read-outs would no doubt be exchanged between civil servants afterwards.
She went on: “But there was a resistance from other countries to the idea that they had to be watched in their engagement with representatives from Scotland. Foreign Office officials who tried to speak over or undercut Scottish ministers tended to find themselves reprimanded not by the Scottish contingent but by those representing the governments we were meeting.”
Lloyd also spoke of several occasions whereby UK officials were present when foreign politicians and leaders expressed support for Scottish independence.
She said: “One poor UK ambassador had to sit through a dinner in an independent-minded country where politicians of different parties spoke of their personal support for the idea of Scottish independence — not at the suggestion of the Scottish first minister but at the invitation of their head of state.
“Another listened stoney-faced as a prominent foreign prime minister extended their best wishes to the Scottish Government in its cause.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel