POLICE Scotland's investigation into the SNP's finances has reportedly cost more than £1 million.
Operation Branchform was sparked by a formal complaint to police in March 2021 over how donations made to the SNP for a second independence referendum campaign were spent.
The probe was not formally launched until a few months later, in June, and has seen multiple high-profile party figures, including former first minister Nicola Sturgeon, arrested and released without charge.
READ MORE: The inside story of how Westminster snubbed Scotland from an AI summit
Former treasurer Colin Beattie and former chief executive Peter Murrell were also arrested, questioned, and released without charge, while Sturgeon has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing.
The investigation's raid on the home of Sturgeon and her husband Murrell, former SNP chief, prompted weeks of headlines earlier this year.
However, it's understood that Police Scotland have still not submitted a report to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) over their investigation.
The lack of movement on Operation Branchform in recent months led to a group of lawyers urging the Crown Office to explain what was taking so long.
And now, a Freedom of Information (FOI) request by the Scottish Sun on Sunday has revealed that the total cost up to the end of October for the probe is £1,084,620.
The costs are understood to include salary and overtime pay for officers, vehicle hire, and the cost of the raid on the Murrell and Sturgeon home in April.
Craig Hoy, the Scottish Tory party chairman, said: “This hit on Police Scotland’s budget — which is already overstretched — could have been avoided if senior SNP figures were honest about their financial affairs from the outset.”
An SNP spokesperson responded to the figure, stating: "Police Scotland is responsible for its expenditure and answers to the Scottish public."
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf calls for Lords to be scrapped after Mone interview
However, Police Scotland refused to comment on the cost of the inquiry so far.
“As the investigation is ongoing we are unable to comment further," a spokesperson said.
The probe centers around a complaint made regarding £600,000 in donations raised in 2017 for a second independence referendum.
Campaigner Sean Clerkin, who lodged the complaint with police, told the Daily Record in November that he believed officers were "dragging their heels".
It came as two senior lawyers, Kevin Drummond KC and Douglas Cusine, argued the public are entitled to know why the investigation is taking so long.
The former sheriffs said that the "continuing delay" in bringing the case to a conclusion could stimulate "perceptions of a cover up".
At the time, the Crown Office insisted they had not received a report from police, and therefore the investigation was still ongoing.
Last July, outgoing Police Scotland chief constable Iain Livingstone (below) suggested that the investigation had “moved beyond” the initial complaint and officers were probing potential embezzlement or misuse of funds.
He defended the use of a blue forensics tent outside of Murrell and Sturgeon’s home, after suggestions it was “over the top”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article