TWO men have pleaded guilty to using racist verbal abuse towards pro-Palestine protesters on Armistice Day.
Ian Beim, 57, and Kevin Sweeney, 61, both admitted racially aggravated public order offences against members of the public at London’s Waterloo station on November 11 following a pro-Palestine sit-in demonstration.
Both men spoke only to enter their pleas, confirm their names, dates of birth and addresses in a hearing at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Monday.
A verbal altercation broke out between Beim, Sweeney and the protesters shortly after a sit-in at the station had been dispersed around 5.30pm, the court was told.
Beim, of Surbiton, south-west London, and Sweeney, of West Molesey, Surrey, were heard shouting abuse and recorded on phones belonging to several of the demonstrators.
Sweeney approached one man taking a video and said “Yeah, you terrorist c***”, to which Beim added “Yeah, go on, keep going.”
Both men then walked towards another small group of protesters, where Beim stumbled into an activist who was recording after he was pushed by Sweeney.
They then boarded a train where they continued to use abusive language towards members of the public, including calling them “terrorists” and “bombers”.
READ MORE: Glasgow Zara closes as pro-Palestine protesters target retailer
Representing Sweeney, Tobias Smith said the charges were “not the most substantial disturbance we have seen” towards pro-Palestine protesters, and constituted “a bit of shouting”.
Smith said his client had lost his job as a result of the case.
Representing Beim, Tony Jacobs described his client’s behaviour as “disgraceful” and “atrocious”, but told the court: “We do not believe people who go on marches shouting ‘From the river to the sea’ are that timid.”
Both Smith and Jacobs asked the court to consider a financial penalty as punishment for the offences.
Chairwoman of the bench Emily Fergus said the court would be ordering reports from probation on the case, and granted Beim and Sweeney unconditional bail.
The pair will return to Westminster Magistrates’ Court on January 15 next year for sentencing.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel