A CARBON land tax on Scotland’s largest landowners has moved a step closer after the Scottish Government included a promise to consider the proposal in the Budget.
One of the UK’s leading wild land charities welcomed the commitment in the Scottish Budget to “include consideration of a proposal for a Carbon Emissions Land Tax (CELT), as has been suggested by the John Muir Trust”.
The John Muir Trust previously told The National that the tax would apply only to landholdings over 1000 hectares with an exemption in place for community-owned land.
It is based upon a “polluters pay” principle with landowners seeing a reduction in their tax burden if they take action to sequester carbon by, for example, creating more woodland and restoring peatlands on their property.
Shona Robison included the promise to consider the policy in a Budget which saw increased funding for the environmental sector.
Funding for NatureScot, the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA), and the National Parks programme all increased.
READ MORE: 'Patronising' Scottish Labour MSP tells Shona Robison to be quiet
Mike Daniels, head of policy for the John Muir Trust, suggested this joined-up approach will help make ecological land management work for local communities and local economies.
He said: “If our model for an emissions-linked land tax is implemented it will be a world first, an entirely new form of taxation designed to encourage landowners of Scotland’s biggest estates to reduce carbon emissions.
”The tax as envisaged by the Trust would not apply to ordinary homeowners, tenants or smaller business properties but focus solely on the very largest landholdings in the country – areas that could accommodate more than 1,500 Hampden stadiums.”
The Trust has said it wants the power to introduce the legislation to be left to local authorities, with any revenues raised locally retained and spent on actions related to reducing emissions, such as public transport and nature restoration.
“If the final legislation aligns with the John Muir Trust proposal landowners can minimise their carbon emissions and potential land tax obligation through ecologically sound land management practices such as native tree planting, restoration of peatlands and a range of other initiatives,” said Daniels.
“Our focus is to change behaviours amongst the biggest, most environmentally damaging landowners in Scotland, no matter where they reside.
“That’s why our model is intended to apply only to holdings over 1,000 hectares and so exempt crofters, small farmers, and other community landowners.”
“Under the Trust’s proposal local authorities would have the power to introduce the tax at their own discretion, with all revenues retained by councils.
READ MORE: When Michelle Mone put The National 'on legal notice'
“Councils could then elect to spend the money raised to foster biodiversity, protect nature, or reduce impacts on climate – like projects to extend concessionary public transport, cycling infrastructure, energy efficiency, and community nature restoration.
“That’s why we’re heartened to see the Government committing to serious consideration to our innovative model.
“CELT has the potential to focus and help regulate a range of initiatives to improve land management, and help Scotland fulfil its Net Zero pledges to reduce carbon emissions.
“And that’s good news for local government, local communities, Scotland, and the world.”
The John Muir Trust has already launched a public petition in support of the tax.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel