FORMER finance secretary Kate Forbes has said the UK Government’s cuts to Scotland’s Budget are “brutal” amid fears over whether a key target to combat the housing crisis will be met.
The Scottish Government revealed yesterday that £205.1 million would be cut from the housing budget – with £188.8m coming from the new homes fund.
In the wake of the budget, the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations said the cuts would have “long-lasting consequences for the nearly 250,000 people throughout Scotland stuck on a waiting list for a social home”.
Forbes, who narrowly lost out to Humza Yousaf in the SNP leadership race earlier this year, highlighted analysis from the Scottish Funding Council which showed rapidly declining capital budgets as a result of cuts in Westminster.
She said: “The UK [Government] is cutting Scotland’s capital by 20% (after inflation) by 2028/29 – that’s brutal for Scotland’s infrastructure, including roads, schools, hospitals.”
Capital spending is different from day-to-day spending and is focused on investing in infrastructure and physical assets.
According to the Scottish Fiscal Commission, the Scottish Government’s funding from Westminster has increased by 0.9% after taking into account inflation.
But an increase in spending on things like the NHS and social security means cuts to the capital budget, which is to fall by 4%.
The Scottish Government has a target of building 110,000 new affordable homes by 2032, while three councils have declared a housing emergency.
A review of this target which was scheduled to take place in 2026-27 has been brought forward to next year.
READ MORE: Council tax freeze 'will result in cuts to vital services' amid £160m cash shortfall
Speaking on BBC Radio Scotland on Wednesday, Deputy First Minister Shona Robison (below) said the target was still “important”, but there would have to be different methods of funding used to fulfil it.
“A 10% cut to our capital budget over the next five years is having an impact on our capital programmes,” she said.
“What we had to prioritise next year was our legal and contractual commitments, things that were already in train.”
She added: “What we’re doing, and the work we’re doing with the housing minister, is to look at how we can lever in innovative finance.
“Work is well advanced on that to make sure that working with private sector organisations we can lever in additional finance because we recognise that affordable housing is a key anti-poverty measure and we want to be able to deliver on our commitments, but we’ll have to do that in a different way.”
READ MORE: 'Patronising' Labour MSP tells Finance Secretary to sit down and be quiet
Local authorities have also raised fears they will be forced into making swingeing cuts as a result of the council tax freeze.
Cosla, the body which represents Scotland’s 32 local authorities, said that the Budget has dealt cuts of £350.5m to councils.
But Robison has insisted the funding settlement for councils was “not a bad offer”.
She pointed out local authorities were getting a bigger slice of the overall budget – to the tune of £14 billion – but acknowledged the impact of cuts to capital funding.
“And of course on capital, yes, capital is difficult, we’ve got a 10% cut to our capital budget over the next five years, so nowhere in the public sector can be immune from the impact of that capital budget reduction that we are having to manage,” said Robison.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel