THE UK has been increasingly sliding towards populism since the Brexit referendum and checks and balances on the government’s power are being eroded, a top political expert has warned.
Alison Young, the Sir David Williams Professor of Public Law at the University of Cambridge, said that certain “constitutional guardrails” – such as the expectation that ministers should resign if found to have misled parliament – did not seem to apply any more.
“It's hard to keep track of these standards because we see most of them in constitutional conventions,” Young (below) explained.
“The more you have aspects that we previously would have seen as breaching conventions going unpunished, the more we start removing these standards.
“When it comes to things like misleading the House … we do have examples of people even inadvertently misleading the House as a minister and then resigning. But this just doesn't seem to be the case anymore and that's the problem."
Young, who will take over as public law commissioner at the Law Commission in 2024, added: “How far are these ‘constitutional guardrails’, these internal standards of behaviour, actually checking the actions of those in power?
“If those in power don't see these as standards they need to follow anymore, then it becomes very, very hard to hold them to account.”
READ MORE: Experts query lack of appeal against ‘questionable’ gender reform court ruling
Durham University’s Aileen McHarg, another professor of public law, also warned that the British constitution’s reliance on convention seemed to be becoming inadequate.
Responding to the news that the Scottish Government would not challenge the UK’s block on its gender reform bill, McHarg wrote: “One thing that events of the past five/six years have clearly shown is that relying on convention and political understandings to temper the legal powers of the UK institutions simply does not provide adequate protection against the undermining of devolution.”
Young argued that appeals to the “will of the people” had grown increasingly frequent and were being used to circumvent checks and balances on the decisions of the elected government.
The professor, who also serves as a legal advisor to the House of Lords Constitution Committee, pointed to the idea of an “elective dictatorship”.
READ MORE: Tories claim public wants to 'ignore' Supreme Court Rwanda ruling
She said: “I think we've been seeing this [erosion of checks on governmental power] for a very long time, but what really struck me about the post-Brexit constitution was the extent to which this was being almost lauded as a good thing.
“[There’s an idea that] we don't need these checks and balances because the government has been voted in, it has its mandate to go away and implement its manifesto. And so, in some sense, any form of check and balance is contrary to what the people want.”
Asked if she thought the slide towards populism had increased since Brexit, Young said: “Yes, very much so. I think it's been the impact of the Brexit referendum because it did split the country so drastically.
“It became almost like a political talisman … I think that has started triggering this idea of ‘there's only one view of what people want’ and that’s what you’re going to follow.”
Young’s ideas are explored more fully in her newly published book Unchecked Power? How Recent Constitutional Reforms Are Threatening UK Democracy.
She said it is the first time she has penned a “trade book”, explaining: “It's a kind of odd label, but it essentially means it's aimed at the general public.”
READ MORE: Warning of ‘Brexit 2.0’ with UK in 'permanent state of uncertainty' after leaving EU
Asked why she had decided to write it, the professor said: “It came from talking to people. I felt I needed, after lockdown, to try and join a gym and it was talking to people there who, once they asked me about what I did, would say, well, what does this [political event] mean?
“It just made me realise that people are interested, they want to know what's going on. But we don't necessarily as a country educate people more generally on how politics works, how the country works, how the constitution works. You do get people in England who don't understand what devolution means because it's just not taught.
“It just made me realise that if you want a system in which leaders of whatever political persuasion are held to account, then you need to make sure that the general public understands how the constitution works.”
Professor Alison Young’s book Unchecked Power? How Recent Constitutional Reforms Are Threatening UK Democracy is available at https://bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/unchecked-power.
She has also written a blog post on the topic for University College London’s Constitution Unit. You can read it here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel