THE operator of a train service that featured in the Harry Potter films has lost a High Court challenge against a rail regulator over the safety of doors on its carriages.
West Coast Railway Company Ltd (WCRCL) took legal action against the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) after it refused to exempt the company from rules banning the use of hinged doors without central locking earlier this year.
The company, which runs the Jacobite service – known popularly as the Hogwarts Express – complained that the multimillion-pound cost of having to retrofit central locking could “destroy” its business and argued its door systems were just as safe.
But in a ruling on Friday, a judge dismissed the operator’s case and concluded that the ORR had taken a “justifiable” approach.
READ MORE: Galashiels: Plans for new Scottish museum dedicated to Robert Coltart
Justice Thornton said in her written judgment that WCRCL is the largest operator of “heritage train tours” in the UK.
The company also operates the Flying Scotsman “which is considered to be one of the best-known locomotives in the world”.
The Jacobite, a popular tourist attraction, runs between Mallaig and Fort William across the Glenfinnan Viaduct (below) in the Highlands.
The judge said a feature of WCRCL’s Mark I trains is their hinged doors which “can be opened by anyone inside the train even when the train is moving”.
Instead of a central locking system, WCRCL’s vehicles have a “secondary” mechanism where doors are pulled shut into a locked position and a bolt is used on the inside of a coach.
The ORR, the safety regulator on Britain’s railways, told the judge that “it does not wish to see heritage train operators go out of business” but from March this year wanted to ensure heritage trains “meet minimum safety standards” by introducing central locking.
Safety regulations were made in 1999 after passengers were killed or injured by falling from the doors of Mark I trains or being hit by doors opened at platforms, the court was told.
In January 2005, a rule came into force banning rolling stock with hinged doors without central locking, but the regulator can issue exemptions.
WCRCL’s legal challenge centred on an ORR exemption refusal in January and March.
The operator currently has an exemption in place until February 29 2024, after a whistle-blower report triggered an ORR inspection that led to safety changes by WCRCL earlier this year.
The company, whose trains run at speeds of up to 100 miles per hour, argued in court that its door procedures were as safe as a central locking mechanism, with train stewards operating them and warning signs for passengers.
The ORR disagreed and took the view that WCRCL was “unable to demonstrate that its controls of the risks from secondary door locking make it as safe as central door locking”.
The operator claimed the ORR’s earlier decision was a “serious interference” that the regulator had “wholly failed” to justify.
At a hearing last month, WCRCL’s lawyers said it would “destroy” the business if it had to spend around £7 million to fit central locking, “which is approximately seven times the company’s average annual net profit, thereby wiping out the company’s profits for the best part of a decade”.
They said £50m in economic value to the wider community would be lost “if the business does not survive,” claiming this had been “disregarded” by the ORR alongside other considerations.
The Jacobite contributes £19.3m a year to the Scottish economy on top of £4.72m in ticket revenue from 101,429 passenger journeys, the court was told.
ORR was accused of acting disproportionately and unlawfully, while it was also alleged it had “misinterpreted” safety regulations.
But Justice Thornton concluded that “the general interest lay firmly in favour of refusing (WCRCL)’s application for an exemption”.
She said it was “common sense” that a central locking system was safer than one “dependent on no more than an assumption by the guard that the stewards have locked the doors”.
The judge said the ORR had previously noted that there was no evidence of a WCRCL investigation or “lessons learnt” after a train left York station with a door open in October 2020 and when a passenger overpowered a steward to open the door of a moving train in June 2022.
The ORR’s upper estimate to fit out four trains for daily use with central locking was just under £1.4m, the judge said, adding that a “modest” rise in fares – amid WCRCL having a “monopoly” – should allow it to pay for fitting the system “in a phased manner”.
READ MORE: Whisky distillery on NC500 named visitor attraction of the year
A £10 increase in the Jacobite service fare, where an average return ticket is £46.58, would generate about an extra £1m per year in revenue with no additional overheads, Justice Thornton said.
She added that almost all other heritage train operators had accepted the requirement to install central locking, passing on the cost to customers and that ORR was willing to allow a transition period for retrofitting.
Welcoming the ruling, an ORR spokesperson said: “As the rail regulator, we are committed to ensuring the safety of all passengers.
“Other charter heritage operators which use the mainline railway have made the necessary investment to install central door locking on ‘hinged door’ carriages and it remains open to the West Coast Railway Company Limited to do the same.
“Such converted carriages can both retain their heritage appeal yet also reflect minimum modern safety standards.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel