THE SCOTTISH Government is being urged to publish its draft Good Food Nation Plan without further delay.
Rising dependency on food banks and plummeting healthy life expectancy in some parts of Scotland mean there is no time to be lost in improving people’s access to good food, according to campaigners.
In the poorest parts of Scotland, healthy life expectancy for men is now less than 45 years old – the lowest in the UK and 22 years before pension age.
Apart from the cost to the individual, this results in greater demand for health services, Pete Ritchie of the Scottish Food Coalition pointed out.
“You can’t run a country if people are spending almost half their working lives on the sick,” he said. “No-one wants to be ill and many people want to eat healthy food but can’t access it or afford it.
“Ill-health is not all down to food but good nutrition could probably fix quite a few problems.”
READ MORE: UK left out as EU agrees to ‘landmark’ transport plans
Eighteen months ago, the Scottish Parliament unanimously passed the Good Food Nation Act but there is no sign of the draft action plan yet.
“It’s quite a long time to be waiting and we really need to start working on it because if you are born today in one of the poorest parts of Scotland then all you can expect in terms of a healthy life is a little more than 44 years,” said Ritchie.
“The whole point of the Good Food Nation is to try and tackle some of the deep-rooted problems we have. For example, the demand on food banks has gone up and more people are feeling food insecure than there were before.
“The Government needs to think about how we change the food culture in Scotland so that it is easy for people to eat the food they want to eat and that keeps them well.
“Life expectancy in Scotland is dropping and food is part of that. Unhealthy diets are taking people young and if they are not dying, then poor nutrition is giving them heart attacks and strokes.”
Ritchie pointed out that the Nordic countries have spent the last 20 years trying to change their whole food system so that more people are eating more nutritious food.
“Governments can change things but it is not going to happen overnight and that is why we are keen to get this plan out,” he said.
“We produce great food but much of it goes abroad and we want to see the Government putting as much effort into supporting good food at home as good food for exports.
“Also a lot of our food is processed down south and jobs could be created here for that.”
Ritchie said that the Scottish Government had improved people’s health by taking action on tobacco and alcohol as well as introducing the Scottish Child Payment.
“If you talk to food banks, they are seeing fewer families using them because of the Scottish Child Payment even though demand generally is increasing,” Ritchie said.
READ MORE: MSP warns of 'tragic consequences' of drink driving over Christmas
Free school meals are also a positive move but the quality of school and hospital meals still needs to be improved, the Scottish Food Coalition believes.
It also wants a new policy brought in that would see a hub in each community where hot meals would be both affordable and nutritious and available to all.
“We want to change the offers for people and give them an alternative to fast food places – somewhere they can sit down and eat a good meal and get some company if they want it, as one-third of people in Scotland now live in single-person households,” Ritchie said. “One chippy won’t kill you but if that is all you have then that’s not great.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “We will publish a consultation draft of the national Good Food Nation Plan in early 2024.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here