THE Scotland Office has claimed it does not know how many staff it has working in its flagship Edinburgh hub.
The National lodged a Freedom of Information (FOI) request with Alister Jack’s department in an attempt to establish how many staff were working in Queen Elizabeth House.
The building, not far from the Scottish Parliament, was opened in 2020, later formally opened by Jack two years later.
We recently revealed that it costs a staggering £11 million to run each year, prompting accusations that it is a “monumental” waste of money and a “PR stunt”.
READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Scotland is crying out for a bolder vision
But the extent of how many civil servants working for the Scotland Office operate from the hub has been kept under wraps.
The National asked how many Scotland Office staff members were currently permanently working from its Edinburgh headquarters, their pay grades and how often Scottish Secretary Alister Jack (below) works from the site.
However, we were told that the information is “not held” by the Scotland Office.
“It may be helpful to explain that the Scotland Office is one of many UK Government Departments working in Queen Elizabeth House in Edinburgh,” the FOI response said.
Instead, we were told to ask His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for the total number of civil servants working in the hub through FOI. The National lodged the request in early December but is unlikely to get a response before January.
When the building was opened, it was designed to house around 3000 staff, but it has not been established how many are actually working in the hub from each UK Government department.
We were also told that Scotland Office officials did not hold any information relating to how regularly Jack visits the Edinburgh HQ.
“There is no set schedule for office days for ministers,” the response said.
“Ministerial business is broadly organised to fulfil Parliamentary commitments, departmental business and ministerial visits. Therefore we do not hold this information.”
Tommy Sheppard (below), the SNP’s Scotland spokesperson at Westminster, said the response did not “give a lot of confidence” in the management of the department.
“You could ask that question of any business in Scotland and they would be able to tell you, probably almost immediately, how many staff they have,” he said.
“They’re being generally obstructive and finding any reason not to conform properly to the FOI protocols.
“In doing that, I think they’ve made themselves look like idiots by not saying how many staff they have.
“It’s not a huge operation, it’s a pretty small department. Maybe they don’t know how many they’ve got because they keep increasing PR officers in a desperate attempt to sell the Union.”
Sheppard has been battling the UK Government to release its secretive polling on the Union since 2019.
The Cabinet Office’s refusal to publish the data it holds was first heard at a First-Tier Tribunal in 2021, which ruled that ministers should release the information – but they still haven’t.
The SNP MP is still awaiting the latest court judgment after the case was taken to an Upper Tribunal in September this year.
“They’re taking their cue from the Cabinet Office who are the world leaders in terms of frustrating FOI requests,” he added, in relation to the staffing numbers.
A report from a House of Commons committee in July revealed that a dedicated Cabinet Office meeting room in Queen Elizabeth House had not been used to host UK Government ministers since it opened.
READ MORE: BBC Scotland corrects more errors than other BBC UK branches combined
When the building was opened, promises were made that ministers would spend a “significant amount of time” in Scotland, but a report found between March 2021 and February 2022, ministers had visited on just five occasions totalling six days.
We previously told how the Cabinet Office refused to say how many times a committee on the Union has met while Rishi Sunak has been Prime Minister.
It follows previous attempts by this newspaper to establish how many times the Cabinet Union Strategy Committee (CUSC), which replaced the Union Unit after it lost two leaders in the space of two weeks, met under Boris Johnson.
Similar reasoning was used to rebuke our request for any details on how often it had met during the Tory prime minister’s tenure.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel