THE Scottish Government are facing calls to impose regulations on wood burning stoves to limit air pollution.
Asthma and Lung UK Scotland are calling on Scottish ministers to increase public awareness of the pollutants associated with domestic burning, claiming many people view wood burners as a green alternative to coal or gas.
They are also calling for a ban on the sale of the most polluting fuels such as house coal and wet wood as well as a nationwide scrappage scheme for the most inefficient burners.
Heat from a wood-burning stove is mainly confined to one room and is often used in conjunction with, and not instead of, central heating.
READ MORE: Wood-burning stoves: MPs support calls for 'pollution warning’ labels
Using a wood-burning stove, in combination with gas central heating. could save the average household £131 a year, according to previous analysis by Gemserv.
However, there is concern over the dangers of indoor air pollution the stoves produce and the impact on the environment and people’s health.
Joseph Carter, head of devolved nations for the charity, said: “The idea of a cosy wood burning stove in the winter might sound appealing.
“But burning wood in our homes could be putting ourselves and our neighbours at risk and is a really inefficient way of heating a home. Burning wood is a source of air pollution both inside and outside homes, particularly PM2.5, which is the most dangerous pollutant to human health.
He added: “The vast majority of stoves are being installed in areas with access to mainline gas supplies for secondary heating sources.
“Most people see them as a green alternative to coal or gas, and are unaware of the dangers, both for them and for their neighbours, of the air pollution it can cause.”
What regulations are already in place?
Recent regulations mean all stoves sold in the UK must incorporate Ecodesign which drastically cuts back on the release of unhealthy particulate matter (PM).
Across the UK, there’s been an 89% increase in PM2.5 emissions from wood burning as a fuel between 2010 and 2021. PM2.5 consists of fine particles of less than 2.5 micrometres in diameter that can penetrate deeper into the lungs, the heart and blood stream.
The Stove Industry Alliance (SIA) says an Ecodesign compliant wood burning stove produces up to 80% less particulate matter compared to an older, basic stove model and up to 90% less than an open fire.
Is the Scottish Government considering a ban?
It is estimated that the NHS in Scotland spends £500 million each year on lung disease, including lung cancer and respiratory infections, making it the fourth most costly disease area.
A centre-right think tank has recently suggested the inclusion of warning labels to curb the problem, and the Conservative Environment Network, a grouping of more than 100 green-minded Tories, backed their recommendations. However, the UK Government has said they are not considering an outright ban for England.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'There is an increased focus on awareness-raising and education around good burning practice amongst the public, together with encouraging uptake of the cleanest and most technologically advanced stoves on the market.
“We are also planning a comprehensive review of the Clean Air Act 1993.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel