THE Scottish Government’s Budget contains no money for public service reform, council leaders have insisted.
They also hit out at increases in the Government’s “internal costs” while their own budgets are disproportionately affected by cuts to capital funding.
Cosla - an umbrella body representing Scotland's councils - has said it is seeking an urgent meeting with Finance Secretary and Deputy First Minister Shona Robison stressing council leaders "will not let this lie".
The organisation has been voicing its unhappiness with the Budget following a meeting of council leaders in December.
Deputy First Minister Shona Robison’s budget offered £144 million to councils as compensation for freezing council tax.
READ MORE: Why are junior doctors not striking in Scotland?
However, Cosla said this would not fully fund the freeze, warning services would be at “breaking point” with “cuts in every community”.
In a statement on Wednesday, Cosla said: “The budget as it stands leaves not a single penny for transformational public service reform – there is very limited scope for a focus on spend to save.
“The 2024-25 budget shows a clear difference between the treatment of local government and other public bodies, with local government disproportionately impacted by cuts to capital funding.”
Cosla said the Scottish Government’s internal costs had increased by £40 million across capital and day-to-day spending.
The umbrella group continued: “A person-centred reform agenda based on prevention needs to be driven locally, where people are closest to and can take part in the decisions that affect them the most.
READ MORE: Common Weal: How we can make this a year of progress for Yes
“Forcing change from the centre denies local people and communities the opportunity to shape the services in a way that best meets their needs.”
Cosla added: “Cosla’s president, vice president and political group leaders from all parties have written to the Deputy First Minister and are seeking an urgent meeting.
“Council leaders will not let this lie, they simply cannot afford to because it will have such a detrimental impact on the communities they represent.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel