LIBDEM activists who deliver more leaflets and knock on more doors will be given a cash boost to their General Election budgets by the party’s HQ.
As campaigning ramps up ahead of the Westminster election, the date of which has still not been set, PoliticsHome reports that regional activists in target seats will be ranked on a variety of key performance indicators.
It’s understood that campaigners working in target seats will be graded in internal party league tables on efforts to recruit new members, raise more funds, the number of leaflets distributed, and doors knocked.
READ MORE: Labour 'set to scale back' ban on lobbying for former ministers
The regional activists who rise up the league table will be rewarded with more campaigning cash by HQ.
The party is hoping to make significant gains in Tory heartlands at the next election, and improve on their current 15 MPs, four of which have Scottish constituencies. They won 11 at the last General Election in 2019 but have bolstered numbers through several by-election wins.
The LibDems are understood to be targeting around 30 or so key seats that will be given the bulk of the party’s resources, the majority of which will target the Tories “Blue Wall” in the South of England. They are seats where a large number of voters backed remain in 2016.
It comes as party leader Ed Davey demanded Prime Minister Rishi Sunak call a May General Election.
Reports suggest that activists will need to hit the business like four key performance indicators, leaflets, doors, fundraising, and recruitment, to unlock the extra cash.
“If you want to win you’ve got to prove yourself, and then you get more HQ resource,” a Lib Dem source told Politics Home.
As the Tories have much more funding behind them, only recently spending a whopping £30,000 on Facebook adverts for Rishi Sunak in the space of a week, the LibDems are understood to be focusing their efforts on groundwork and pushing activists to hit as many doors as possible.
READ MORE: Reform UK to stand candidates in each Scottish General Election seat
Campaigning in Surrey on Wednesday, the LibDems demanded a General Election on May 2.
The PM has the power to hold the vote as late as January 2025.
Party leader Ed Davey said: "Four historic by-election wins and sweeping gains in last May's local elections show that voters across the country are turning to us for change.
"We shouldn't have to wait any longer.
“It shouldn’t be up to Rishi Sunak to cling on for another 12 months, desperate for something to turn up.
“He knows the time is up, that’s why he hasn’t called the general election so far.”
In a campaign stunt, Davey unveiled a “Tory removal service” poster to highlight the Lib Dems’ four by-election gains from the Conservatives since 2019’s Westminster election.
READ MORE: Scottish Greens to stand more candidates at next General Election
Davey was visiting Michael Gove and Jeremy Hunt’s constituencies, with the LibDems hoping they could snatch the Cabinet ministers’ seats.
Gove held the Surrey Heath seat with a majority of 18,349 over his LibDem opponent in 2019, but the LibDems have eyes on the area after taking control of the local council in May 2023.
They have also become the largest party on Waverly Borough Council, in the Chancellor’s local area.
The LibDems have won seats in Chesham and Amersham, Buckinghamshire, Tiverton and Honiton, Devon, and Somerton and Frome, Somerset, in by-elections in the south of England since 2019.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel