JOANNA Cherry has said she “takes issue” with Mhairi Black’s claim that some SNP MPs “absolutely love” being at Westminster and have grown too comfortable there.
The SNP MP and KC spoke out in her column for The National, telling her group deputy leader: “There is a difference between being comfortable and doing the job you were elected to do.”
It comes after Black told Times Radio: “I’ve seen folk who you would have thought would have been the first one marching to the Border with a claymore but now absolutely love being in London. I wouldn’t have expected that.
“I will not specify if they are current or not, but yes, I’ve come across ones where I’ve thought, ‘hmmm, you appear slightly more comfortable than I think you should be’.”
READ MORE: Mhairi Black: SNP's reliance on Nicola Sturgeon was 'uncomfortable'
The interview was conducted before Black stands down as the MP for Paisley and Renfrewshire South at the next General Election.
Cherry wrote a response to Black’s comments in her column on Friday.
She said: “I want to take issue with what Mhairi Black said about some SNP MPs being too comfortable at Westminster.
"There is a difference between being comfortable and doing the job you were elected to do. It is not easy being an opposition MP for years on end, but with painstaking work and the building of cross-party consensus, good things can be achieved.”
The Edinburgh South West MP pointed to the work of her colleagues, including Ronnie Cowan, Patricia Gibson, Carol Monaghan, and Marion Fellows, as well as her own headline-making success in taking Boris Johnson’s government to court over its prorogation of parliament.
Cherry said that to achieve such a thing, “we must be present and performing our jobs at Westminster as well as spending time working in our constituencies”.
She added: “The SNP are not an abstentionist party. Those who want that policy to change need to do the work to build a campaign to get it debated and changed at conference.”
Cherry also responded to Black’s comments, again made to Times Radio, in which she claimed she had “always” had issues with how the SNP was being run under Nicola Sturgeon.
READ MORE: Scottish Green LGBT wing criticises SNP after Brian Souter dinner
Cherry wrote: “Just as those of us who were worried about the governance of the party and the management of its finances under the previous leadership had to campaign and stand for election to the NEC to do something about it.
“We could have done with the support of those only now speaking out because, at the time, we were thwarted. However, I don’t think anyone could seriously argue that we have not been vindicated by subsequent events.”
Black and Cherry were both first elected to Westminster at the 2015 General Election.
Black now serves as deputy leader of the Westminster group, running as second to Stephen Flynn in the internal elections to replace Ian Blackford held late in 2022.
Cherry lost her role as a frontbencher in early 2021 under Blackford’s leadership and has not been reinstated.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel