SCOTTISH Government ministers have rejected plans to build a “community” wind farm near the English Border.
Proposals for a 45-turbine site straddling Dumfries and Galloway and the Borders were elevated to Government level in October 2021, and have now been rejected following an inquiry.
In May 2019, Cheshire-based Community Windpower Ltd first applied to construct the Faw Side wind farm near Langholm, but the plans were met with numerous objections including from the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and Historic Environment Scotland (HES).
READ MORE: 'Onshore wind is UK's cheapest power source. It shouldn't just be for corporations'
HES said the farm would have detrimental impact on the integrity of the setting of Roman-era Eweslees Watch Tower, while the MoD raised concerns about the impact on the nearby Eskdalemuir Seismological Recording Station and Array.
The array is a seismological monitoring station which forms part of the UK's obligations under a treaty banning nuclear tests. The Scottish Government's website states: "The array's operation can be compromised by excessive seismic noise in the vicinity, which is proven to be produced by wind turbines operating within a 50 km consultation zone around the array."
Both Dumfries and Galloway and the Borders councils also objected to the development.
Officers at the Scottish Government’s Planning and Environmental Appeals Division recommended the plans be rejected, and ministers agreed.
A letter informing Community Windpower Ltd managing director Rod Wood of the decision reads says ministers believed “the significant adverse landscape and visual effects, effects on residential visual amenity and impacts on defence interests at Eskdalemuir would not be acceptable”.
It goes on: “The Scottish Ministers therefore consider the Application for consent under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 for the construction and operation of Faw Side Community Wind Farm, located within the council areas of Dumfries and Galloway Council and Scottish Borders Council, should be refused.”
READ MORE: 'Renewables jobs growth shows Scotland needs powers over energy'
Community Windpower Ltd had said that the 45-turbine farm would “contribute significant financial benefit to the local communities through a community benefit fund of £14m over its lifetime, which equates to £350,000 every year”.
The firm also claimed the farm would “contribute £157m to the Dumfries and Galloway and Scottish Borders Councils through business rates, during its operational lifetime”.
Of the proposed turbines, 13 would have been in the Borders and 32 in Dumfries and Galloway.
Wood said: "We are obviously disappointed with this decision. However, we are taking time to review the reports and decision.
"Nonetheless, we remain committed to Scotland's renewable energy industry, businesses and supply chains."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel