THE BBC has been urged to issue an on-air correction after “fake news” on Reporting Scotland.
It comes after the programme, shown on BBC Scotland on Thursday night, saw a journalist report: "In most UK elections, Scottish votes have been crucial to deciding who takes power. Will it be any different this time around?"
However, a House of Commons report from 2010 underlines that this is not the case.
Sorry @BBCScotlandNews this is completely fake news. Scottish seats have not controlled the balance of power in a UK election in my lifetime. I am sure you will be happy to correct this and not intentionally mislead the electorate ? pic.twitter.com/0TKB6lxDCe
— Christopher McEleny (@ChrisMcEleny) January 4, 2024
Counting every General Election between 1945 and the present day, just four would have had a different result if Scotland’s votes were not included.
In 1964, Labour won a majority. Without Scotland, the Tories would have been the largest party, but without a majority.
The two elections of 1974 saw Scottish votes make Labour the largest party. And in 2010, if Scottish votes had not been included, the Tories would have had a majority without needing LibDem support.
After the BBC journalist’s assertion, polling expert Professor John Curtice spoke to say that it was unclear whether Scottish votes would be “necessary” for Keir Starmer’s Labour to win a majority.
The British Polling Council president (below) said: “Labour may be sufficiently far ahead that what they get in Scotland may simply add to their majority rather than create it in the first place.”
Calling out the BBC reporter's comment on social media, Alba general secretary Chris McEleny said it was “completely fake news”.
He went on: “Scottish seats have not controlled the balance of power in a UK election in my lifetime. I am sure you will be happy to correct this and not intentionally mislead the electorate?”
Speaking to the National, McEleny said the BBC should make clear that its reporter’s assertion was closer to a Labour political slogan than reality.
“The claim may simply have been an error, but if not then it’s the same sort of line that the Labour Party will be parroting in the run up to the General Election,” he said.
READ MORE: BBC flooded with complaints of pro-monarchy bias over King Charles documentary
“Hundreds of thousands of people watch the BBC news in Scotland and trust that the news they receive is accurate. This clearly isn’t. The only way Scotland will ever be able to truly influence the Government’s we vote for is with independence.
“Now I don’t expect the BBC to make that clear, but at the very least they should be making clear on air that their General Election claims weren’t just accurate but that the facts speak to the opposite.”
An SNP spokesperson said: “Under the Westminster system, the Tories have not won an election in Scotland since 1955 and yet they have been in power for the vast majority of that time.
“As a result, Scotland has suffered under damaging policies like austerity and a hard Brexit; which have been forced upon us despite the fact that we repeatedly voted against them.”
A BBC spokesperson stood by the report.
“In his report, our correspondent was exploring an important and relevant question – namely the potential importance of the election campaign in Scotland to the UK-wide results," they said. "It led into a clip from Professor Sir John Curtice who offered expert analysis on that point.
“During the piece our correspondent simply articulated the view that Scottish votes in UK General Elections have been crucial not only in determining which party gets a majority but also the scale of victory and the ability of UK governments to hold and wield power over time.
"The importance of Scottish votes and voters in UK General Elections is seen by the resources devoted by all the major parties to winning seats here.”
As The National reported late in 2023, last year BBC Scotland issued more corrections than all of the BBC's other national and regional UK broadcasting arms combined.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel