NICHOLAS Rossi, a fugitive suspected of faking his own death, has been extradited from Scotland to the US, according to reports.
Rossi is wanted in the US for allegedly raping a woman in Utah in 2008 and also faces domestic abuse charges.
He is alleged to have faked his own death before hiding out in Scotland, where he was discovered by police in Glasgow in 2021.
It is understood police in Essex are also investigating him in relation to a non-recent allegation of rape.
Scottish ministers signed an order in September last year giving permission for Rossi, 36, to be extradited, following a lengthy case in the Scottish courts.
READ MORE: 'Fake news' - BBC panned over claim about Scottish votes in General Elections
Rossi had claimed he had been the victim of mistaken identity – telling courts he is an Irish orphan named Arthur Knight.
But a sheriff found he was Nicholas Rossi, and the appeal against extradition was dismissed in December, paving the way for him to be removed from the country.
A spokesperson for Police Scotland told the PA news agency: “We assisted partner agencies with the extradition of a 36-year-old man.”
Rossi was arrested last year in connection with that investigation and has been bailed until March.
He initially came to the attention of authorities when he was in the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (below) in Glasgow in 2021, where he was being treated for Covid-19.
The subsequent case gathered international attention for its bizarre nature, with Rossi – who would be taken into court in a wheelchair while using an oxygen mask – steadfastly claiming he was Knight.
In his appeal against extradition heard in the autumn, Rossi – who repeatedly criticised his own lawyers – represented himself, making claims including that he would not receive a fair trial in the US because he was investigating those seeking to extradite him, that he had been denied medical care in prison, and hitting out at what he called a “media circus” surrounding the case.
READ MORE: Former Scottish police chief returns MBE over UK's stance on Gaza
But the decision of Lady Dorrian, Lord Malcolm and Lord Armstrong said much of the material Rossi had included in his note of appeal had “absolutely no relevance” to it and the “only vaguely recognisable ground” he submitted was that of defective representation.
The decision concluded with a reference to a sheriff’s previous statement about facets of Rossi’s character complicating what he considered to be “a straightforward case”.
It said: “We agree with the sheriff that the appellant’s case is, at its core, a straightforward one.
“The evidence supporting that the appellant is Nicholas Rossi was overwhelming. He did not, nor does he now, produce anything which would suggest to the contrary.
“The conspiracy theories which he tendered in explanation were properly rejected. The sheriff carefully considered the submissions made on the appellant’s behalf as to the potential barriers to his extradition.
“Having heard evidence from various medical witnesses, there was quite simply nothing to support that he was suffering from any mental health condition, far less one which would render it unjust or oppressive to extradite him.”
They said “nothing placed before the court demonstrates that the appellant’s trial would either be unfair or that any of his other convention rights would be violated if extradited”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here