OIL from new licences granted to North Sea producers and sent to UK refineries would account for less than 1% of the fuels used here in 2030, analysis has found.
The Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU) said new projects like Rosebank would therefore make little difference to prices or the UK’s energy independence and security – one of the Government’s key arguments for supporting further production.
It has also said North Sea oil and gas would reduce the UK’s reliance on imports and therefore reduce the emissions involved in shipping.
In answer to a written parliamentary question, the Government accepted that around 80% of the oil produced in the UK is refined overseas into products that are then shipped back over.
It also said “it is not desirable to force private companies to ‘allocate’ oil and gas produced in the North Sea for domestic use,” appearing to admit that much of the oil produced by Rosebank and other projects would be sold abroad.
READ MORE: 'Horrifying' stats show over a third of Scottish households in fuel poverty
The Government is also trying to pass legislation, due in the Commons on Monday, that would require the North Sea regulator to invite applications for new oil and gas licences on an annual basis instead of the five-year average currently in place.
Critics have accused the Government of backing new production as a way to create a dividing line with Labour as a General Election approaches.
Professor Gavin Bridge, fellow of the Durham Energy Institute at Durham University, said: “The reality is very little of the oil pumped from the North Sea is refined and sold on British soil, and even then the price is largely dictated by international markets.
“The notion that more drilling on the continental shelf boosts our energy security doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
“Most of the oil is extracted by private or foreign state-owned companies over which the Government has little control.”
For their analysis, the ECIU looked at oil from UK fields produced in UK refineries and at products made in those refineries like diesel, petrol and aviation fuel.
They found that very little oil used in the UK is produced and refined here – just 13% in 2022.
As the amount of available fuel in the North Sea declines and demand falls, this will reduce to 1% by 2030.
Dr Simon Cran-McGreehin, head of analysis at ECIU, said: “New licences are a distraction from policies that would have a real, lasting impact on the UK’s energy independence.
“Oil from new fields such as Rosebank will be traded internationally – as the Government has admitted. This oil is not earmarked for the UK and it won’t make any real difference to UK prices.”
READ MORE: What does the Tories' latest 'raid' on North Sea oil and gas mean for Scotland?
A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesperson said: “With energy markets becoming more unstable, it makes sense to make the most of our own homegrown advantages in the North Sea.
“That’s why we’re backing the UK’s oil and gas industry with annual licences, supporting 200,000 jobs and giving them certainty to invest in jobs here and unlock billions in tax for our own transition to clean energy.
“As a net importer of oil and gas, the UK increasingly produces less oil and gas than it uses. These new licences will not make us a net exporter or increase carbon emissions above our legally binding carbon budgets.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel