FIRST Minister Humza Yousaf has defended his decision to speak to controversial bus tycoon Brian Souter and insisted that “nobody” in the SNP has asked him for a donation.
Yousaf recently had an “upfront and honest” conversation with the businessman, who once funded a nationwide campaign to keep Section 28 on the statute in Scotland.
The policy prohibited the “promotion of homosexuality” by local authorities and prevented teachers from discussing sexuality or LGBT+ rights at school.
However, Yousaf said discussions with Souter relating to the arrangement of a dinner at a five-star hotel in Edinburgh were part of a bid to reset his government’s relationship with the business community.
Scottish Green minister Patrick Harvie said it needed to be made “very explicit” that the Scottish Government did not share Souter’s views on social issues.
READ MORE: Brian Souter should be nowhere near a progressive government
Speaking to ITV Border, the First Minister emphasised that meeting with Souter (below) did not change his stance on progressive issues.
“People know where I stand on social, progressive values [and the] government I lead, where we stand on social, progressive values," he said.
“And, just to be clear, by the way, nobody has asked Brian Souter for a donation. He has not offered a donation to the SNP.
“This was a business dinner with other entrepreneurs from right across Scotland, giving me advice, giving me their thoughts on where they thought the government was in relation to its business engagement [and] what we had to do to improve that business engagement.
“I’m not going to stop engaging with entrepreneurs, with businessmen and women across Scotland even if they disagree with my politics, even if they disagree with my constitutional position [or] even if they disagree with my social values.”
Once a large donor to the SNP, Souter’s relationship with the party cooled during Nicola Sturgeon’s tenure as party leader.
Souter founded the Stagecoach Group along with his sister Ann Gloag.
Together, they have frequently been listed as being among the richest people in Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel