ONE of Scotland’s most senior judges has told MSPs she thinks it is worth having a pilot of rape trials without juries, proposals which have proved controversial in the legal profession.
Lady Dorrian, the Lord Justice Clerk, said such a scheme would provide valuable evidence on how it could work.
The Law Society has said trial by jury for serious crimes is a “basic right” and should not be undermined.
On Wednesday, Lady Dorrian spoke at length to Holyrood’s Justice Committee about the recommendations of a review group she chaired – noting it is unusual for a member of the judiciary to speak to lawmakers and that she had received special dispensation to do so.
Legislation going through Holyrood takes forward a number of recommendations in Lady Dorrian’s report, including the establishment of a specialist sexual offences court.
READ MORE: BrewDog announces it will no longer pay new workers Real Living Wage
She told the MSPs that changes in the justice system to improve the experience of victims in sexual offences cases needs to go “beyond tinkering”.
However, she said the provisions in the Victims, Witnesses and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill for a specialist court are “quite complex”.
She told the committee: “They seem to have been based on the creation of the sheriff appeal court, which was a completely different model, a different animal.”
The possibility of the specialist court having a president other than the Lord Justice General or the Lord Justice Clerk “seem to be over complicated and if I may say so counter-productive,” she said.
Discussing juryless trials for rape, she said her review group had been “divided reasonably evenly” on the matter.
An underlying reason behind the suggestion was the prevalence of “rape myths,” she said.
Conservative MSP Russell Findlay asked for her own view on the matter, with the Lord Justice Clerk saying: “I took the view that this was something worth looking at, that was my position. Simply that it’s something worth looking at.
“It’s worth examining, it’s worth having a pilot because, as I’ve already said, then we would have the evidence.”
Lady Dorrian was also asked about other parts of the Government’s Bill, which aims to enshrine a right to lifetime anonymity for victims of sexual and other qualifying offences.
The Lord Justice Clerk, who is considered Scotland’s second-most senior judge, said it would give victims “a degree of comfort” by putting the right to anonymity on firmer legal footing.
She said: “At the moment there is no statutory protection, it’s all based on common law and it’s all based on effectively a gentleman’s agreement with the press.
“The mainstream press have shown themselves to be trustworthy in that respect, and to be able to abide by the convention that they do not identify complainers, but we don’t live in a time when the mainstream press is the only source of reporting.
“We have now to deal with blogging, social media, citizen journalists I think they call themselves.”
She concluded her evidence by calling for a deep-rooted change in culture, saying if this did not happen: “There is every risk that in 40 years’ time, my successor, your successors, are going to be in this room having the same conversation.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel