LGBT+ campaigners are “confident” that opposition from religious groups and the right will not derail legislation seeking to ban conversion practices in Scotland.
On Tuesday, the Scottish Government published proposals to criminalise attempts to change or suppress the gender identity or sexual orientation of another person.
In the wake of the consultation being launched, religious groups such as the Catholic Church were quick to suggest they would cause a “chilling effect” on religious freedom.
READ MORE: What will Scotland's conversion therapy ban do and who is opposing it?
Gender critical group For Women Scotland have also claimed the plans would criminalise parents for “refusing to sign up to the gender ideology cult”.
With the legislation expected to face a legal challenge from critics and religious, who say it will impact freedom of speech and privacy, LGBT+ groups have sought to defend the plans.
Tim Hopkins, director of the Equality Network, said “Every LGBT+ equality measure we have worked on for the past 30 years has been opposed by conservative religious groups and some others.
“We are confident that when MSPs look at this bill, they will realise that the fears are unfounded, because the proposals pay real attention to preserving freedoms of religion and expression.
“The conversion practices bill would only ban behaviour that attempts to change or suppress another person’s sexual orientation or gender identity, and only when that behaviour is coercive and causes the person proven harm.
“No-one should be defending coercive behaviour that harms other people.”
The new law would take a three-pronged approach to outlaw conversion practices, such as therapy or counselling to both physical and sexual abuse, through creating a new criminal offence, establishing a statutory aggravator to already existing crimes, and a civil protection order.
Prosecutors will have to prove anyone engaging in conversion practices intended to change a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity for any conviction to be made, and that the practices or services caused physical or psychological harm to the victim.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon slams 'timid Keir Starmer' in General Election warning
The consultation leaves it up to the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) to decide whether to prosecute under summary procedure, which would give a prison term of 12 months, a maximum fine of £10,000 or both, or solemn procedure, imprisonment of a term of up to seven years, unlimited fine or both.
Conversion practices that include “physical and abusive acts” will carry higher sentences.
Those accused would have a defence if their actions could be proven to be “reasonable in the particular circumstances”, but consent would not be considered a defence under the new law.
A spokesperson for the Catholic Church said: “While the Church supports legislation which protects people from physical and verbal abuse, a fundamental pillar of any free society is that the state recognises and respects the right of religious bodies and organisations to be free to teach the fullness of their beliefs and to support, through prayer, counsel and other pastoral means, their members who wish to live in accordance with those beliefs.”
The spokesperson added that there was a “worrying lack of clarity” about the term “conversion practices” and suggested this could “create a chilling effect and may criminalise advice or opinion given in good faith.”
The Free Church of Scotland and the Evangelical Alliance also said they oppose the plans.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel