MORE than a dozen organisations have called on the Scottish Government to urgently strengthen its plans for land reform.
The Land Reform Bill is set to be introduced to the Scottish Parliament in the coming months in order to address the “impact of scale and concentration of land ownership in Scotland”.
Currently, the legislation is set to apply to “large-scale landholdings” which are defined as estates covering more than 3000 hectares.
As well as having to publish management plans detailing how they will meet the requirements of net zero and nature restoration goals, such estates may also be subject to a Public Interest Test if they are placed on the property market.
The land could then be split into smaller lots which could not be purchased by a single buyer and may even be offered to community bodies in the area.
READ MORE: New Scotland to Europe ferry 'won't work without government support'
However, 15 organisations in Scotland have now signed an open letter to Cabinet Secretary for Wellbeing Economy, Neil Gray, and Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands, Mairi Gougeon, highlighting their concern that the bill does not go far enough.
Led by the Wellbeing Economy Alliance (WEAll) and Community Land Scotland, the letter states that limiting the legislation to estates of more than 3000 hectares mean only a handful of will be subject to the new laws.
Just 386 of the 1.86 million titles in the Land Register had a total land area of over 3000 hectares, according to Registers of Scotland.
However, they are thought to cover around 20% of Scotland’s total land mass.
WEAll Scotland's policy and engagement lead, Dr Lukas Bunse, said: "We are deeply concerned that the current plans for the Land Reform Bill simply don't go far enough and will fail to deliver for the people of Scotland.
“It is essential that the way Scotland's land is managed enables people and communities to thrive.
"The Scottish Government has committed to establishing a Wellbeing Economy in Scotland.
“Changing the way that we own, use and manage land in Scotland is an essential step in achieving this goal.
“We must ensure that communities are part of decision making and benefit from the land around them.
“We know that when land is managed in a way that prioritises dignity, nature, fairness, purpose and participation communities are empowered to sustainably develop their local area in line with their needs."
Dr Josh Doble, policy manager at Community Land Scotland, added: "Scotland has a huge opportunity in 2024 to deliver meaningful land reform which builds upon the proud tradition of community land ownership in Scotland.
READ MORE: BrewDog announces it will no longer pay new workers Real Living Wage
“We are fortunate to have an established and proven model of community land ownership which delivers on Wellbeing Economy principles and is already leading sustainable development around Scotland.
"However, only 3% of Scotland's land is currently owned by the communities that live on that land. This has to change.
“We need land reform legislation which supports existing community landowners and empowers other communities to take ownership of land and assets to drive forward community wealth building, to lead the just response to the nature crises and create resilient, circular economies in their local areas."
The letter proposes that the “blunt” 3000 hectare limit should be replaced with a more detailed criteria for deciding which landholdings are subject to the new legislation.
It proposes that landholdings of more than 500 hectares, those which cover more than 25% of an inhabited island, and those which are deemed to be of “community significance” should all be covered by the new bill.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel