THE First Minister has confirmed the Scottish Government will "in essence replicate" UK legislation banning XL bully dogs without a licence.
Humza Yousaf said the decision to replicate the Dangerous Dogs Act will be taken pending a parliamentary statement next week after the country saw an influx of dogs being abandoned north of the Border.
Speaking at FMQs, he said: “What has become clear, I’m afraid in the last few weeks, is we have seen a flow of XL bully dogs coming to Scotland, a number of people coming to Scotland to bring XL bully dogs here to the country.
"As such, we will give further details to members of the Scottish Parliament through a parliamentary statement if the Parliamentary Bureau agrees next week.
"We will, in essence, replicate the legislation that is in England and Wales here in Scotland because, ultimately, although we do have a very good system of dog control notice schemes, and we do take the approach indeed not to breed, we have to respond to the situation as it currently stands and therefore we will do what we need to do to ensure public safety."
From December 31, legislation in England and Wales means that all bully XLs must be kept on a lead and muzzled in public.
It comes ahead of a ban in February, when it will be a criminal offence to own an XL bully dog in England and Wales without a certificate.
READ MORE: Minister 'concerned' amid reports of XL Bully dogs being rehomed in Scotland
Earlier in January, it was reported that one man had transported around 30 XL bullies to Scotland before a ban on the breed came into force south of the Border.
Sammy Wilkinson from the West Midlands repeatedly drove more than 200 miles to Scotland, collecting groups of XL bullies on the journey.
Last week, Yousaf had said that he did not think a ban on XL bully dogs would be required in Scotland.
He said: "We are monitoring the situation, keeping close to those on the ground. We have a very controlled and quite tight regime when it comes to the management of animals, control of dogs, and that is something that is quite unique in Scotland compared to other parts of the UK.
"We are keeping the potential ban under review. We don't think it is required but it is something we keep under continual review."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel